Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLRC/14/2015 of SHAHANA PARVEEN, KRISHNA DIST. & 2 OTHRS Vs P.P., HYD & ANO on 31 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 14 OF 2015 Between: 1. Shahana Parveen, Krishna District & 2 Others, W/o Syed Mohammed @ Asifpasha R/o D.No.18-5-46, Kedareswarapet,
APHC010187922015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 14 OF 2015
Between:
1. Shahana Parveen, Krishna District & 2 Others, W/o Syed Mohammed @ Asifpasha R/o D.No.18-5-46, Kedareswarapet, 3rd lane , Vijayawada -3 Krishna District
2. Shaik Afeef Ahmed,, S/o Syed Mohammed @ Asifpasha
3. Shaik Zayeem, S/o Ahmed Syed Mohammed @ Asifpasha age 6
years, (Petitioners 2 and 3 being minors rep. by their mother 1st petitioner)
...Petitioners
AND
1. The State of A.P., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad, Hyderabad.
2. Syed Mohammed Asifpasha, S/o Shaik Yakoob Miyan. Occ:
Business, R/o D.No. 12-15-18b, 1st floor, Pandit Nehru road, Tarapet, Vijayawada -1
...Respondents
Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order in
GTK,J
Cr.R.C.No.14 of 2015
so far as it is against the 1st petitioner by allowing the revision in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioners: V SUBRAHMANYAM
Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
The Court made the following order:
GTK,J
Cr.R.C.No.14 of 2015
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard,
Sri V.Subrahmanyam, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, Assistant Public Prosecutor.
This Court, on 04.08.2026, directed the learned Counsel for the petitioner to take out notice to the 2nd respondent. On 18.08.2026, learned Counsel for the petitioner reported that, in obedience to the docket order, dated 04.08.2026, they have tried to cause notice on the 2nd respondent, but it was noticed that the 2nd respondent expired.
Today, when the matter is called, learned Counsel for the petitioner reported that, as the 2nd respondent expired, the Criminal Revision Case may be closed as no further adjudication is necessary.
Recording the above submission of the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case No.14 of 2015 is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed.
________________________ TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA, J
01st September, 2026. Tsy