Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/22756/2026 of SHAIK GOUSYA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 30 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010420522026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22756/2026 Between: 1.

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement :

Date of uploading :

APHC010420522026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

WRIT PETITION NO: 22756/2026

Between:

1. SHAIK GOUSYA, D/O. SHAIK REHMAN, AGED ABOUT 42

YEARS, OCC OFFICE SUBORDINATE, D.NO. 70-20-2141, 3RD

LINE HUSSAIN NAGAR, PONNUR ROAD, GUNTUR - 522003.

2. S.SANKAR NARAYANA,, S/O. LATE R. SUBRAMANYAM, AGED

ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC DEO, D.NO.6/4/232, MARUTHI NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, ANANTHAPURAMU -515001.

3. M. REDDY GOPAL REDDY,, S/O. LATE M.MUNI REDDY, AGED

ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC DEO, D.NO.28-1026, KANNAIAH

NAIDU COLONY, GANGANAPALLI ROAD, CHITTOOR-517001.

4. VANAMA SRIKANTH,, S/O. V. MOHANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41

YEARS, OCC DEO, D.NO.61-6-446, SATYANARAYANA SWAMI

TEMPLE STREET, GUNTUR - 522001.

5. BEZZALA.LAKSHMI NARASIMHA,, S/O. LATE B.NARASIMHULU, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, D.NO- 3-24, GORLA

BAZAR, KUNCHANAPALLI, TADEPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR -

522501.

6. CH.NIRAMAL PRASAD,, S/O. CH.PURUSHOTHAM RAO, AGED

ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC DRIVER, D.NO.5-112, GANDHI NAGAR

8TH WARD, EDUPUGALLU, KRISHNA DISTRICT -521151.

7. AKULA SRINIVAS,, S/O. AKULA CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED

ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC DPO, H.NO.9-301, YARRABALEM (V), MANGALGIRI (M), GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522502.

8. ANISHA DALIPARTHI,, S/O. DVDS PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 37

YEARS, OCC DPO, H.NO.5-37-76, 4/9TH LINE, BRODIPET, GUNTUR-522002.

9. SHAIK MASTAN VALI,, S/O. SHAIK MOHAMAD ANIF, AGED

ABOUT 39 YEARS, OCC DPO, D.NO.15-13-105, GANDHI

NAGAR, NEAR MASID E AKSA, GUNTUR - 522001.

10. EESA.RAKESH,, S/O. E. ELEESHA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC DEO, D.NO.42-108-780, AMBEDKAR NAGAR, KOPPOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT- 523286.

11. CH.KOTESWARA RAO,, S/O. CH.JAYANTHA RAO, AGED

ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC DPO, D.NO-3-89,MAIN ROAD NEAR

NTR STATUE, CHINNAYAGUDEM, EAST GODAVARI - 534316.

12. AGURU.BALAJI,, S/O. A.TIRUPATHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 31

YEARS, OCC DEO, D.NO.1-153, RAMA MANDIRAM, ANTIPETA, MANYAM PARVATHIPURAM DISTRICT - 535546.

13. YELAMANCHILI. ANUSHA, S/O. YELAMANCHILI KANAKARAJU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC DPO, D.NO.15-299, NEAR

BOYS HIGH SCHOOL, DOWLAISWARAM, EAST GODAVARI -

533125.

14. TS.HAVILA,, D/O. LATE TS. YOHAN BABU, AGED ABOUT 45

YEARS, OCC DPO, D.NO.14-729/14, SAI NIVAS, SF2, MANIKYA

NAGAR 4TH LANE, 6TH CROSS ROAD, VIJAYAWADA - 520007.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY.

TRIBAL

WELFARE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PIN 522239

2. AP

SCHEDULE

TRIBES

COOPERATIVE

FINANCE

CORPORATION LTD TRICOR, REP. BY ITS MANAGING

DIRECTOR, KONERU LAKSHMAIAH STREET, VIJAYAWADA.

PIN 520010.

3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY. FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. PIN 522239.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not implementing the Human Resources (HR) Policy of TRICOR dt.

25.09.2017 in favour of the Petitioners in spite of recommendation by the Respondent No. 2 as illegal, arbitrary, descriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to implement the HR Policy uniformly to the Petitioners on par with similarly placed employees with all consequential benefits immediately IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to extend the Petitioners the same benefit of HR Policy on par with similarly situated employees, who have been absorbed as per the HR Policy, 2017, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. M SRIKANTH

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR SERVICES I

2. GP FOR SERVICES II

The Court made the following:

Whether the order is :

Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No

Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

W.P.No.22756 of 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER :

This writ petition is filed questioning the inaction of the Respondents in not implementing the Human Resources (HR) Policy of TRICOR dated 25.09.2017 in favour of the Petitioners in spite of recommendations by Respondent No.2 as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Respondent No.2 is a registered Co-operative society and works under the Tribal Welfare Department with an aim to provide financial assistance to Scheduled Tribe beneficiaries. The Society was also included in the Schedule-IX of the A.P.Re-organisation Act, 2014 and was de-merged vide G.O.Ms.No.19, Tribal Welfare (GCC) Department, dated 16.02.2016. A new HR policy was formulated in the year 2017 allocating 35 posts to Head Office and 30 posts in the District Office and Corresponding amendments to Special Bye-Laws of Respondent No.1 were carried out. The Petitioners who were appointed after due selection process on different dates on contract basis are discharging duties in sanctioned posts.

3. While so, pursuant to the letter of Managing Director of Respondent No.2 on 12.09.2023, the State Government vide G.O.Rt.No.35, dated 26.02.2024 approved the engagement of (04)

persons under HR policy as approved by the Board of Respondent No.2 chaired by the Principal Secretary to Government Tribal Welfare Department, Commissioner for Co-operation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies.

4. One person by name T.Chinna Rao, who is similarly placed as Petitioners filed W.P.No.10714 of 2025 and the same was disposed of on 05.02.2026 directing the Respondents to consider the representation in accordance with HR policy. Pursuant thereto, Respondent No.2 addressed a letter on 27.03.2026 vide R.C.No.SOW03-12044/1/2024-TRICOR SEC-COTW, to Respondent No.1 to issue necessary orders for implementing HR policy as regards Petitioners also. However, no further decision is taken thereon.

5. In the light of above mentioned facts, the writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent No.1 to examine the request of the Petitioners for implementing HR Policy 2017 as recommended by Respondent No.2 vide letter dated 27.03.2026 by taking note of G.O.Rt.No.35 dated 26.02.2024 within a period of four (04) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand dismissed. ___________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 31.08.2026 KLP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead