Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/18243/2024 of Polumuri Rajesh, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 18243/2024 Between: 1. POLUMURI RAJESH,, S/O. LATE CHALANNA RAO, CHRISTIAN, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC SELF

APHC010356072024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 18243/2024

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. POLUMURI RAJESH,, S/O. LATE CHALANNA RAO, CHRISTIAN, AGED 35 YEARS, OCC SELF EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO.39-33-91/2, WARD NO.51, MADHAVADHARA, VUDA COLONY, MARRIPALEM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH530018.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PENDURTHI POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. PEELA RAMU NAIDU, S/O LATE VENKATA RAMANA, HINDU, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D NO. 6-142/1,NEAR MASID, PATHA INAPAKOTTUVEEDHI, KOTHAVALASA, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue any writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not providing Police protection in preventing the interference of the respondents 4 in respect of the affairs of Vacant Site of an extent of 755.4 Sq.yards or 631.161 Sq.meters covered under S.No.34/3A, situated at Krishnarayapuram village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh despite there is an order of STATUS QUO vide its orders I.A.411/20222 in O.S 69/2021 Dated 23/08/2022 on the file of VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam, and also representation of the petitioner Dated 09/07/2024 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of Natural justice and also the violation of Art.21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide Police protection preventing the interference of respondent 4 in respect of the affairs of Vacant Site of an extent of 755.4 Sq.yards or 631.161 Sq.meters covered under S.No.34/3A, situated at Krishnarayapuram village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, expeditiously as early as possible duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 09/07/2024 and pass s IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondent no 3 to provide police protection restraining the respondent No 4 from interfering over affairs of Vacant Site of an extent of 755.4 Sq.yards or 631.161 Sq.meters covered under S.No.34/3A, situated at Krishnarayapuram village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh in view of orders in I.A.411/20222 in O.S 69/2021 Dated 23/08/2022 on the file of VII Additional District & Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam duly considering the representation of the petitioner dated 09/07/2024 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JADA SRAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

WRIT PETITION No. 18243 of 2026

The Court made the following O R D E R:

Sri G. John Deva Sundar, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri Jada Sravan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn the present Writ Petition with liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, leaving it open to the petitioner to work out his appropriate legal remedies in accordance with law.

As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J

Dated:31.08.2026 BSM

WRIT PETITION NO: 18243/2024

BSM Dt: 31.08.2026

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead