Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/2692/2008 of Sardar Yasin Vs Ch. Sankara Rao Reddy, on 30 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2692 OF 2008 Between: 1. Sardar Yasin, S/o. N.M.D. Amanulla R/o. A.B. stores, Bimili, Visakhapatnam District. 1. Ch Sankara Rao Reddy, S/o. yellayya Reddy,
APHC010011592008
IN THE
MONDAY,
THE HONOURABLE DR
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL
Between:
1. Sardar
Yasin,
S/o.
Visakhapatnam District.
1. Ch Sankara Rao R
Pedagantyada, Visakhapatn
2. A Vijayabhaskara Reddy
Kurnool District.
3. National Insurance Comp
Branch Office, K.G.H.Down
Appeal filed under Ord
IA NO: 1 OF 2000(CMP 10
Petition under Section
in the affidavit filed in suppo
IA NO: 1 OF 2008(MACMA
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
THE 31st DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
R JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PR
L MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 269
N.M.D.
Amanulla
R/o.
A.B.
stor
..
AND
Reddy, S/o. yellayya Reddy, R/o. N
nam District.
y, S/o. Ranga Reddy, ISVI Village, Ado
pany Limited, Represented by its Branc
n, Visakhapatnam.
...Re
der 41 of CPC before the High Court
151 CPC praying that in the circumstan
ort of the petition, the High Court may be AMP 2899 OF 2008
H
RATAPA
es,
Bimili,
..Petitioner
Nellimukka,
oni Mandal,
h Manager,
spondents
nces stated
e pleased
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Order Substituted Service on the first Respondent herein by publication in Eenadu Telugu Daily News Paper, Visakhapatnam.
IA NO: 1 OF 2016(MACMAMP 4419 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Set aside Abetment caused due to death of 1st Respondent i.e Ch.Sankara Rao Reddy In the MACMA 2692/2008.
IA NO: 2 OF 2016(MACMAMP 4420 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring Respodent no's 4 to 6 as The LR's of Deceased Respondent in The MACMA 2982/2008.
IA NO: 5 OF 2016(MACMAMP 33218 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: G V JAYASIMHA
Counsel for the Respondents: S A V RATNAM Counsel for the Respondents:.
The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2692 OF 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant(s). The proceeding sheets dated 25.08.2026 would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
2. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 31.08.2026. KKV
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 2692 OF 2008 Dt.31.08.2026
KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: MACMA No.2692 of 2008 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
31.08.2026
Dr.VJP,J
IA NO: 2 OF 2016(MACMAMP 4420 OF 2016 As the main appeal is dismissed as non- prosecution, the present petition is closed. MACMA No.2692 of 2008
The Appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
(Vide Separate Judgment)
_________ Dr.VJP, J KKV