Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/25310/2011 of Smt.Syed Munni Vs The Honourable District Judge, Kurnool on 24 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25310/2011 Between: 1. SMT.SYED MUNNI, W/O.LATE SYED YOUSUF
APHC010605392011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
WRIT PETITION NO: 25310/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SMT.SYED MUNNI, W/O.LATE SYED YOUSUF R/O.H.NO.1-34/53/2/1 COURT ROAD, SURAJ NAGAR, ATMAKUR KURNOOL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE HONOURABLE DISTRICT JUDGE KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
2. THE HONOURABLE JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not regularizing the services of the petitioner as Sweeper illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and consequently direct the respondent to regularize the service of the petitioner as Sweeper and pass in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the SSR/minimum wages to the petitioner as per the Proceedings of the District Collector, dated 9.9.2009 pending disposal of the writ petition in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Y RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC)
2. P S P SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following:
Writ Petition No: 25310 of 2011 ORDER: (per Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)
As no arrangements were made by the petitioner to enter appearance, despite service of notice sent through the Registry, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”, vide order dated 24.08.2026.
2. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for respondents is in attendance.
4. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA
______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Date:25.08.2026 Pmk
WRIT PETITION NO: 25310 of 2011
Date: 25.08.2026 Pmk