Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/2475/2026 of Nagireddy Kondareddy, Vs M.Venkata Sivarama Reddy, on 24 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2475/2026 Between: 1. NAGIREDDY KONDAREDDY,, S/O.VENKATA KONDAREDDY, F.P. SHOP DEALER, SHOP NO. 0811008,

APHC010349482026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2475/2026

Between:

1. NAGIREDDY

KONDAREDDY,,

S/O.VENKATA

KONDAREDDY, F.P. SHOP DEALER, SHOP NO.

0811008, GARLADINNE VILLAGE, KONAKANAMETLA

MANDAL, MARKAPUR DISTRICT. A.P.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. M VENKATA SIVARAMA REDDY, Revenue Divisional Officer, Markapuram-5213316, Markapur District, A.P.

...CONTEMNOR

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondent under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, for willfully, violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No. 4827 of 2026, dated 19-2-2026, passed by his Lordship Justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. Alapati Vivekananda

Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 19.02.2026 passed in W.P.No.4827 of 2026.

2. Sri K.V.M. Chiranjevi, learned counsel, representing Sri Alapati Vivekananda, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the order of this Court disobedience of which is complained of, in this Contempt has been complied with, therefore nothing remains for further adjudication in this Contempt Case and the same may be closed.

3. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 25.08.2026 ANS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead