Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/7555/2021 of SHAIK NAZEER Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 24 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 7555/2021 Between: 1. SHAIK NAZEER, S/O NAGUR VALI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO.
APHC010122102021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 7555/2021
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SHAIK NAZEER, S/O NAGUR VALI, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, RIO. DOOR NO.4-604, S.RK.T. COLONY, 16TH LANE. NEAR MASZID, KESANUPALLI, NARASARAOPET MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE NARASARAOPET MUNICIPALITY, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
3. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ELECTION COMMISSION, 1ST FLOOR, NEW HODS BUILDING, M.G.ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP.BY THE STATE ELECTION COMMISSIONER, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in issuing the voter list prepared on the basis of the proceedings 13021/49/2019-D, dated 17-12-2019 is in contravention of the same proceedings and in violation of the draft polling stations list and proceeding to conduct the election without rectifying it is as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution of India and consequently direct the municipality not to proceed with the elections without rectifying the voter list and further direct the state election commission not to issue election notification for the 2nd respondent without rectifying the voter list and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to issue election notification for the 2nd respondent without rectifying the voter list and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S
2. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP )
3. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV
The Court made the following order: The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition in future, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 25.08.2026 RJS/SKB
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
W.P.NO.7555 OF 2021
Dt: 25.08.2026
RJS/SKB