Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24416/2026 of SRI KADIMI TRIMURTHULU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 24 August 2026
APHC010450202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 24416/2026 Between: 1. SRI KADIMI TRIMURTHULU, S/O. K.VEERABBAI, AGED ABOUT
HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
APHC010450202026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 24416/2026
Between:
1. SRI KADIMI TRIMURTHULU, S/O. K.VEERABBAI, AGED ABOUT 55
YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, RESIDENT OF 4-1-84/2, PEEDA KALAVA
GATTU,
VEERABADRAPURAM,
MANDAPETA,
KAKINADA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
2. SMT. CHINNIADILAKSHMI, W/O. LATE CHINNI SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCCBUSINESS, RESIDENT OF 4-1-84/2, PEEDA KALAVA GATTU, VEERABADRAPURAM, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (M) DEPARTMENT, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT, AMRAVATI, ANDHRA
PRADESH.-522239
2. THE MANDAPETA MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TOWN-HALL ROAD, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA/EAST GODAVARI
DISTRICT, A.P.-533308
3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R B KAKINADA. KAKINADA
DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533003
4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MANDAPETA, KAKINADA/EAST
GODAVRI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.-533308
HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the official of the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 in interfering and threatening to demolish the shop belonging to the Petitioners situated beside Bus stop bearing (old 34-19-4)
situated
at
Peeda
Kalava
Gattu,
Veerabadrapuram,
Mandapeta,
Kakinada/East Godavari District, Andhra ,Pradesh, without issuing any notice as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, violative of the principles of natural justice, violative of fundamental guaranteed under the Constitution of India under Article 300-A, violative of the provisions of the Municipalities Act, 1965 and contrary to the order passed by this Honble Court in W.P.No.22100 of 1999
dated 10.10.2001 and W.P.No.18520 of 2018 05.06.2018
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 not to demolish the shop belonging to the Petitioners beside Bus stop bearing (old 34-19-4) situated at Peeda Kalava Gattu, Veerabadrapuram, Mandapeta, East Godavari District, AP or interfere with business pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVAS BASAVA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP
HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The petitioners are aggrieved by the action of respondent No.2 in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the small road-side tea stall being run by them.
2. It is submitted that the petitioners had earlier filed W.P.No.18520 of 2018 and that this Court, vide order dated 05.06.2018, disposed off the said writ petition, directing the respondents therein to follow due process of law if the subject property is required for a public purpose.
3. It is submitted that, though there is an order of this Court, the respondents have been orally directing the petitioners to vacate the said shop.
4. The learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2, on receipt of written instructions, submits that respondent No.2 has identified vending zones for accommodating eligible street vendors and that the petitioners and other similarly situated vendors have been informed that they may carry on their business activities in the designated vending zones in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations.
5. The learned Standing counsel appearing for respondent No.2 further submits that the petitioners have occupied Irrigation land and that the said occupation is causing hindrance to the movement of traffic as well.
6. Recording the above submissions, the present writ petition stands disposed off, making it clear to respondent No.2 that the petitioners shall be accommodated in an alternative vending zone area and that 15 days’ time
HN, J
W.P.No.24416_2026 shall be granted to the petitioner to shift from the existing shop in which they are carrying on their business. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:25.08.2026 NKA
Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
HN, J
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 24416 of 2026 Date: 25.08.2026
NKA