Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/19140/2026 of R.B.Chandrakala, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 24 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 19140/2026 Between: 1. R.B.CHANDRAKALA,, W/O. P.VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010358392026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 19140/2026
Between:
1. R.B.CHANDRAKALA,, W/O. P.VENKATARAMANA REDDY, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.
YERRADODDAGARIPALLI,
GORANTLAPALLI
POST,
KV
PALLI
MANDAL,
ANNAMAYYA
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
RURAL
DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522 237.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT - 516 270
3. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SERP, 2ND FLOOR OF THE NTR
ADMINISTRATIVE BLOCK AT THE PANDIT NEHRU BUS STATION
(PNBS) IN VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH 520 013.
4. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR, DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, VELUGU TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517 501.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction, writ, more particularly Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in
ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 suspending the petitioner from the service basing on the news item published in the news paper and without supplying the enquiry report dated 26.03.2026 as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the proceedings issued by the 4th Respondent in ROC.No.DRDA/HR/16/2022, dated 11.05.2026 by reinstating the petitioner into service forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K RAGHU VEER
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.19140 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Basing upon the letter addressed by the petitioner on 13.08.2026 (part of record), learned counsel for the petitioner filed memo of withdrawal dated 24.08.2026. Accordingly, the matter is listed today under the caption ‘for withdrawal’.
2. No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. Basing on the memo of withdrawal dated 24.08.2026, the present Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 25.08.2026
KBN
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.19140 of 2026 Date: 25.08.2026
KBN