Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/31211/2022 of Smt. Syed Munni Vs THE HONBLE DISTRICT JUDGE on 24 August 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3543] TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 31211/2022 Between: 1. SMT. SYED MUNNI, W/O LATE SYED YUSUF, AGED

APHC010504112022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 25th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

WRIT PETITION NO: 31211/2022

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SMT. SYED MUNNI, W/O LATE SYED YUSUF, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. MASALCHI R/O H.NO. 1-34/53/2/1, COURT ROAD, SURAJ NAGAR, ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE HONBLE DISTRICT JUDGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. THE HONOURABLE MUNSIF COURT, AT ATMAKUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an order or writ more particularly in Nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in not extending the minimum time scale of pay to the petitioner's pay attached to the post of Masalchi/sweeper as the same is illegal, arbitrary and unjust and contrary to the judgment reported in 2017 ( I ) SCC 148 and consequently direct the respondents to pay minimum time scale of pay attached to post of Masalchi sweeper to the petitioner in pursuance of judgment reported in 2017 (1) SCC 148 and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the minimum time scale of pay to the petitioner attached to the post of the Masalchi/Sweeper in view of her representation dt. 17.5.2021 pending disposal of writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. P S P SURESH KUMAR The Court made the following:

Writ Petition No: 31211 of 2022 ORDER: (per Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya)

As no arrangements were made by the petitioner to enter appearance, despite service of notice sent through the Registry, this Court directed the matter to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”, vide order dated 24.08.2026.

2. Today also, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for respondents is in attendance.

4. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

______________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

Date:25.08.2026 Pmk

WRIT PETITION NO: 31211 of 2022

Date: 25.08.2026 Pmk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead