Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/23098/2026 of M/s. AR Constructions, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23098/2026 Between: 1. M/S. AR CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR P APPALARAJU, S/O. P KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT

APHC010419262026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 23098/2026

Between:

1. M/S. AR CONSTRUCTIONS,, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR P

APPALARAJU, S/O. P KRISHNAM RAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. MIG-2A-96, VINAYAKA NAGAR, VUDA

COLONY,

VISAKHAPATNAM,

VISAKHAPATNAM

DISTRICT,

PINCODE 530044.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT,

PINCODE

522238.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL

SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR

DISTRICT, PINCODE. 522238.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

DISTRICT, PINCODE 530002.

4. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.

BY

ITS

COMMISSIONER,

VISAKHAPATNAM,

VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, PINCODE 530003.

5. THE

EXECUTIVE

ENGINEERV,

GREATER

VISAKHAPATNAM

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

DISTRICT, PINCODE 530003.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondents not releasing the amount of Rs.

17,24,180/-, even after finalizing the bills, payable to the petitioner in relation to the works i.e.. Re-laying of BT road Raupalem road in secretariat no.

1087026 of ward No.80 in Anakapalli Zone of G.V.M.C, vide Agreement No.

38/2023-24/ SE(W) - IV/ EE-VII/ DB, dated 19.10.2023 is questioned, as the same is illegal, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to pay for pa3mient of amount of Rs. 17,24,180/- to the petitioner in respect of execution of above-mentioned work forthwith

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to pay for payment of amount of Rs. 17,24,180/- to the petitioner in respect of execution of works i.e. Re-laying of BT road Raupalem road in secretariat no. 1087026 of ward No.80 in Anakapalli Zone of G.V.M.C, vide Agreement No. 38/2023-24/ SE(W) - IV/ EE-VII/ DB, dated 19.10.2023, forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following:

WRIT PETITION No.23098 OF 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER :

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entrusted the work i.e., relaying of BT Road at Rajupalem road in Secretariat No.1087026 of Ward No.80 in Anakapalli Zone of G.V.M.C vide agreement No.38/2023-24/SW(E)-IV/EE-VII/DB, dated 19.10.2023.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner had completed the work entrusted to him and that the competent authority of the respondents had also approved the payments due and payable to the petitioner. The respondents have also recorded the progress of the work and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner in the M-Book.

3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Sri.A.S.C.Bose, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.4 and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning.

4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.4, on instructions, submits that the bills have been approved for clearance and that the Government has also released funds towards clearing the outstanding bills of the contractors. It is further submitted that additional funds are awaited and, upon release of the same, the bills due and payable to the petitioner shall be cleared.

5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed off directing the concerned respondent to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM Whether the order is: Speaking

Reasoned ☑ Reportable

Non-reportable ☑

WRIT PETITION No.23098 OF 2026 Dated 24.08.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead