Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/15439/2006 of KADITI APPALA RAJU, SRIKAKULAM & 12 OTHERS Vs THE M.D. E.P.D.CO.A.P.LTD. VISAKHAPATNAM & ANOTHER on 23 August 2026
______________ APHC010057732023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.15439/2006 Between: 1. Kaditi Appala Raju, S/o.K.Sadhu Rao,
Neutral Citation ______________
APHC010057732023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.15439/2006
Between:
1. Kaditi Appala Raju, S/o.K.Sadhu Rao, R/o.D.No.7-6/6-1, Flat No.15, Prakashnagar Colony, Srikakulam.
2.
Doddamreddy
Gopala
Krishna,
S/o.Suryanarayana,
R/o.D.No.7-12-16, Annathapalli Vari Veedhi, Srikakulam.
3. Chamanahalli Srinivas, S/o.Late G.K.Sarma, R/o.D.No.4-3- 69/3, C4, Vyshanapu Street, Srikakulam.
4. Bhyri Koteswara Rao, S/o.Papadu, R/o.M.I.G.-89, Opp: Z.P.
Srikakulam.
5. Bandaru Srinivasa Rao, S/o.Surappadu R/o.Mondati Veedhi, Srikakulam.
6. Kaspa Syamala Rao, S/o.Appa Rao R/o.Dammala Veedhi, Srikakulam.
7. Bavisetti Durga Rao, S/o.not known to the petitioner, R/o.Rella Veedhi, Srikakulam.
8. Kanakala Appala Trinadha Rao, S/o.Late Sanyasi Rao, R/o.Flat No.15, Krishna Nagar Colony, Adavivarampeta back side, Srikakulam.
9. Gurugubelli Mohana Rao, S/o.Seetaram R/o.D.No.16-17-44, P.N.Colony, 6th line End, Gujarathipeta, Srikakulam.
10.
Santosh
Kumar
Panda,
S/o.Premananda
Panda,
R/o.D.No.5-6-7/1, Punyapuveedhi, Srikakulam.
11. Adulla Appa Rao, S/o.Bheema Raju, R/o.Venammapeta Village, Akkalpeta (PO), Ammadalavalasa (Mandal), Srikakulam.
12.Paidi
Dasaradha
Rao,
S/o.Narasinga
Rao
R/o.Sanapalavaripeta
(village),
Fareedpeta
(PO),
Echarla
Mandal, Srikakulam.
13. Murakala Nataraju, S/o.Malleswara Rao, R/o.Karmellipeta Colony, Allikam (PO), Ammadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam.
...Petitioners
AND
1. Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Corporate Office, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by its Managing Director.
2. The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Circle, Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Ltd., Srikakulam.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing the Notification (Annexure-I) dt.12.06.2006 for recruitment of Junior Line Men on contract basis without considering the candidature of the petitioners for absorption who are working as
The Court made the following
NMRs by granting exemption in respect of Educational Qualification and upper-age, as illegal, contrary to law, arbitrary and consequently direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment as Junior Line Men on Contract Basis by granting exemption in respect of educational qualification and age and to pass.
IA No.1 OF 2006 (WPMP 19233 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioners for appointment as Junior Line Men on contract basis by granting exemption in respect of educational qualification and age after suspending notification dt. 12.06.2006 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass.
Counsel for the Petitioners
: Venkateswarlu Posani
Counsel for the Respondents : S. KISHORE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri D. Krishna Vamsi, learned counsel, representing Sri Posani Venkateswarlu, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:24.08.2026 DSH
Whether the order is: Speaking √ Reasoned
Reportable
Non-Reportable √