Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/9958/2024 of SAKURI VARA LAKSHMI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 23 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9958 OF 2024 Between: 1. SAKURI VARA LAKSHMI, W/o. S. Bhagavati Rao, Aged about 63 years, Occ. House Wife,
APHC010196652024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO
KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9958 OF 2024
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SAKURI VARA LAKSHMI, W/o. S. Bhagavati Rao, Aged about 63 years, Occ. House Wife, R/o.Plot No. 28, phase 5, Ground Floor, Sai Srinivas Nagar Colony, Kesarapalli, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi. Guntur District.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Vijayawada, NTR District.
3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada, NTR District.
4. The Station House officer, Krishna Lanka Police Station, Vijayawada, NTR District.
5. Smt Sakuri Abinaya, W/o Kalyan, D/o. late Chandana Trivikrama Rao, Aged about 33 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o. DNo. 41-7-58, Indira Colony, Krishna Lanka, Vijayawada City, NTR District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the
High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent and their sub-ordinate officers in harassing the petitioner and her other family members and also interfering with the personal life and liberty of the petitioners and their family members by Continuously calling to the Police Station at the behest and influence of Respondent No. 5 under the guise on investigation in connection with FIR No.357 of 2023 of Krishna Lanka Police Station, NTR District is illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of article 14 and 21 of The Constitution of India and also contrary to the procedure contemplated under the code of Criminal Procedure and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the personal life and liberty of the petitioner and her other family members pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MD SALEEM
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME (AP)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 9958 of 2024 The Court made the following Order:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with liberty to pursue legal remedies in accordance with the law.
2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home reported no objection for the same.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to pursue legal remedies in accordance with the law. There shall be no order as to costs.
Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.08.2026 PSA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 9958 of 2024
Date: 24.08.2026
PSA