Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/723/2026 of A. Narasinga Rao, Vs Sri. Peeyush Kumar, I.A.S., on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 723/2026 Between: 1. A . NARASINGA RAO,, S/O. A . CHINARANGA RAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. H. NO.

APHC010071382026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 723/2026

Between:

1. A. NARASINGA RAO,, S/O. A. CHINARANGA RAO AGED ABOUT 46

YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. H. NO. 2-211, PANCHALINGALA, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATHI, GUNTURDISTRICT.522237

2. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL

ADMINISTRATION

AND

URBAN

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT,

SECRETARIAT

BUILDINGS,

VELAGAPUDI,

AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522237

3. SRI P VISWANATH, COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL MUNICIPAL

CORPORATION KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.-518004

4. SRI P V SESHA SAYEE, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER-1, KURNOOL

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. - 518004

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents No.1 to 4 herein for willful violation and deliberate disobedience to the Order of this Hon'ble Court dated 24.07.2025 passed in W.P. No. 23297 of 2024 as contemplated under sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased , it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dispense with the personal appearance of Respondent No.1 on 21.08.2026, as directed by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 24.07.2026, and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. V NITESH

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA

2. P VENGALA REDDY

The Court made the following:

CONTEMPT CASE No.723 OF 2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.23297 of 2024, dated 24.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.

3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM

CONTEMPT CASE No.723 of 2026 Date: 24.08.2026

KGM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead