Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/13447/2022 of A NAGARAJU Vs THE STATE OF AP on 23 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022 Between: 1. A NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE APPALARAJU, AGED ABOUT. 54 YEARS, W/AS DRIVER (U/R),
APHC010225782022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022
Between:
1. A NAGARAJU, S/O. LATE APPALARAJU, AGED ABOUT. 54
YEARS, W/AS DRIVER (U/R), VISAKHAPATNAM DEPOT-I, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM
DIST.
D.NO.6-44-
9/1,T.V.N.COLONY,OLD GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM,
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
AP,
REP.
BY
ITS
SPECIAL
CHIEF
SECRETARY,
LABOUR,
FACTORIES,
BOILERS
AND
INSURANCE
MEDICAL
SERVICES
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI.
GUNTUR DIST.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, D.NO.33-7-6-,33-8-14, PATURIS
PAPAIH
STREET
X
ROADS,
SITARAMAPURAM,VIJAYAWADA-520002
3. THE CHAIRMAN INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL CUM PRESIDING, OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, GVMC ZONE-III BUILDING, SURYABAGH,VISAKHAPATNAM-20.
4. THE DEPUTY CHIEF TRAFFIC MANAGER, , A.P.S.R.T.C, 0/0
THE REGIONAL MANAGER, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. THE DEPOT MANAGER, A.P.S.R.T.C,. VISAKHAPATNAM
DEPOT-I,VISAKHAPATNAM, AP.
6. THE REGIONAL MANAGER, , APSRTC, VISAKHAPATNAM
CUTY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
7. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, APSRTC, VIZIANANGARAM
ZONE, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court
may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of certiorari calling the connected records including the orders ID.No.8/2020 dt.31-08- 2021 by the 3rd respondent and consequential orders vide G.O.Rt.No.226, Labour, Factories, Boilers and Insurance Medical Services(OP)Department, Dt.24- 09-2021 of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and as the punishment of removal is totally disproportionate to the alleged charge and selective action and further declare that the petitioner is entitle for reinstatement with continuity of service with all consequential benefits.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G SEENA KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LABOUR
2. SOLOMON RAJU MANCHALAFOR (APSRTC)
The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms. S.R.P.S.Sundari, learned counsel represented on behalf of Sri G.Seena Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the present Writ Petition and the same is also endorsed on the bundle.
Permission is accorded and accordingly the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.08.2026
siva
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.13447 of 2022
Date: 24.08.2026
siva