Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/900/2026 of RENDLA SUBBAREDDY Vs G. SAI PRASAD on 23 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE N BETWEEN: 1. RENDLA SUBBAREDDY, S/ 2. MUKKARA GOPI REDDY, S/ 70 YEARS. 3. KUDUMULA KRISHNA REDDY, S/ YEARS, LR OF KUDUMULA MASTHANAMMA. 4. G SHUBAN BEE, W/
APHC010097282026
IN THE H
(
MONDAY,
THE HONOURABLE S
CON
BETWEEN:
1. RENDLA SUBBAR
2. MUKKARA GOPI
70 YEARS.
3. KUDUMULA KRIS
YEARS, LR OF KU
4. G SHUBAN BEE, W
OF VALLURU SAN
5. DUNNUTHULA PO
S/o. YELLA REDDY
6. MALE ADILAKSH
YEARS.
7. KOTHURU
LAKS
REDDY, AGED 65
RESIDENTS
OF
PEDDAPALLI
PO
DISTRICT.
1. G
SAI
PRASA
RESOURCES
SECRETARIAT,VE
DISTRICT.
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR
TEMPT CASE No. 900/2026
REDDY, S/o. SUBBAIAH, AGED 64 YEA
REDDY, S/o. LATE LAKSHMI REDDY,
SHNA REDDY, S/o. GOPI REDDY, AG
UDUMULA MASTHANAMMA.
W/o. CHAKRAVARTHY, AGED 50 YEAR
NTAIAH.
OLIREDDYGARI VENKATA SUBBA R
Y, AGED 70 YEARS.
UMMA, W/o. CHINNAPA REDDY, AG
SHMINARASAMMA,
W/o.
RAMACHA
5 YEARS. ALL THE PETITIONER
F
NEW
MALLINENPATNAM
VIL
OST,
SIDDAVATAM
MANDAL,
K
….PETITION
AND
AD,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
W
DEPARTMENT
(IRRIGATION),
ELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI,
G
R RAO
ARS.
, AGED
GED 64
RS, LR
REDDY,
GED 52
ANDRA
RS ARE
LLAGE,
KADAPA
NER(S)
WATER
A.P
UNTUR
2. SRI ADHARSH RAJEENDRAN, SPECIAL COLLECTOR (LAND
ACQUISITION)(FAC) GALERU NAGAR SUJALA SRAVANTHI
PROJECT (GNSS) KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT.
3. SRI B SIVARAMI REDDY, SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND
ACQUISITION,
SOMASILA
PROJECT,
UNIT-LV,
KADAPA, KADAPA DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to call the contemnors herein and punish them under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Sections 10
to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willful disobedience and deliberately violating the orders passed by this Hon’ble Court in W.P.No.4720 of 2023 dated 25.09.2025 and to pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.SUDEEPTHI POTLURI
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1.SUSHMA YAGANTI
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners represented and stated that the orders of this Court dated 25.09.2025 in W.P.No.4720 of 2023, are complied with by the respondents.
In view of the said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.08.2026 Harin
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
C.C.No. 900 OF 2026
Date: 24-08-2026
Harin