Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/543/2020 of S. Somla Naik Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 24 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 543/2020 BETWEEN: 1. S. SOMLA NAIK, S/o. S. BHEEMULA NAIK, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC. SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, FACTION ZONE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, A.P. 1.

APHC010002662020

IN THE H

(

MONDAY,

THE HONOURABLE S

WR

BETWEEN:

1. S. SOMLA NAIK, S

OCC.

SUB-INSP

KURNOOL, KURN

1. STATE

OF

AND

SECRETARY

TO

SECRETARIAT, VE

2. THE DIRECTOR G

OF ANDHRA PRAD

3. THE DEPUTY INS

RANGE, KURNOO

4. THE SUPERINTE

KURNOOL.

Petition under Artic

in the circumstances s

Court may be pleased to

in the nature of Writ of M

the respondents in givin

of Sub-Inspector of P

Memorandum Rc.No.

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THE 24th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR

RIT PETITION No. 543/2020

S/o. S. BHEEMULA NAIK, AGED 56 Y

PECTOR

OF

POLICE,

FACTION

OOL DISTRICT, A.P.

...PETIT

AND

DHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRIN

O

GOVERNMENT

HOME

DEPART

ELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DIST.

GENERAL OF POLICE HOF, GOVERN

DESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DIST

SPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KUR

OL.

NDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DIS

...RESPONDE

cle 226 of the Constitution of India pray stated in the affidavit filed therewith, t o issue a writ, order or direction particul Mandamus to declare the inaction on the g notional seniority to the petitioner in th Police as assured by the 3rd respon C1/05/2010 dated 24.01.2012 as p

R RAO

YEARS,

ZONE,

TIONER

NCIPAL

TMENT,

NMENT

RICT.

RNOOL

STRICT,

ENT(S):

ying that

he High

arly one

e 2art of

he cadre

ndent in

punitive,

perverse, arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and direct the respondents to fix the seniority of the petitioner in the cadre of Sub-Inspector of Police on par with his junior Sri V.T. Ramdas Naik w.e.f. 27.12.2010 in “B” List instead of 23.04.2013 and pass such other order or orders.

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.C SRINIVASA BABA

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR SERVICES I (AP)

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The Writ of Mandamus is filed to declare the inaction on the part of the respondent in giving notional seniority to the petitioner in the cadre of Sub Inspector of Police as ordered by the 3rd respondent in Memorandum Rc.No.C1/05/2010 dated 24.01.2012, as perverse, arbitrary, illegal and violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to direct the respondents to fix seniority to the petitioner in the cadre of Sub Inspector on par with his junior Sri V. Ramdas Naik, w.e.f. 27.12.2010, in ‘B’ list, instead of 23.04.2013.

2. As seen from the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the petitioner was given accelerated promotion as Head Constable in the year 2003 and later he was reverted back as Police Constable on 11.08.2026, challenging the same, the petitioner file O.A. No.5604 of 2006, before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal. The said O.A. was allowed and the 3rd respondent was directed to treat the seniority of the petitioner from the initial date of promotion as Head Constable for the purpose of further promotion, as the petitioner is continuously worked as Head Constable, till the date of regular promotion.

3. Aggrieved by the orders in O.A. No.5604 of 2006, dated 12.03.2010, the State preferred Writ Petition No.21820 of 2010. The

Division Bench of the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh, dismissed the writ petition confirming the orders of the Tribunal, inter alia it is observed that the office recommended the case of the petitioner for accelerated promotion considering the outstanding services rendered by him. There was no justification in issuing proceedings, dated 11.08.2006 reverting the petitioner to the police constable post.

4. Aggrieved by the order in W.P. No.21820 of 2010, the State preferred S.L.P. (CC) No.7545 of 2011, before the Hon’ble Apex Court and the said S.L.P. was dismissed by the Hon’ble Apex Court on 06.05.2011, confirming the orders of the Tribunal and the erstwhile High Court of Andhra Pradesh.

5. Learned petitioner’s counsel would submit that the 3rd respondent issued proceedings dated 24.01.2012, informing that the case of the petitioner will be considered for promotion to the post of S.I. on par with his junior, if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and qualifies in the test and training.

6. Learned petitioner’s counsel further submitted that the 3rd respondent has issued proceedings dated 13.11.2018 requesting the 2nd respondent to address letter to the Government to assign notional seniority, in respect of petitioner S. Somlanayak on par with his junior Sri V. Ramadas Naik, Junior S.I. with effect from 27.12.2012.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that subsequent to the dismissal of the S.L.P. by the Hon’ble Apex Court, a review petition filed by the State was also dismissed on 30.12.2025. And it is settled principle that successive review petitions are not maintainable.

8. Without adverting to merits of the case, the 1st respondent is directed to take necessary steps on the recommendation made by the 3rd respondent, dated 24.01.2012 and 30.11.2018, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the order and communicate the decision to the petitioner herein, as the petitioner is on the verge of retirement.

9. With the above said direction, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.08.2026 Harin

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO

W.P.No. 543 OF 2020

Date: 24-08-2026

Harin

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead