Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/6840/2026 of Kanneganti Venkata Ramana Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6840/2026 Between: 1. KANNEGANTI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. NAGAYYA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,R/O.2-71 RAMANAIAH
APHC010416382026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6840/2026
Between:
1. KANNEGANTI VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. NAGAYYA, AGED ABOUT
49 YEARS,R/O.2-71 RAMANAIAH PETA,YEDLAPADU VILLAGE
MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT.
2. KANNEGANTI SARATH CHANDRA, S/O. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED
ABOUT
YEARS,R/O.2-71,
RAMANAIAHPETA,YEDLAPADU
VILLAGE MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT.
3. KANNEGANTI RADHIKA, W/O. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT
50 YEARS,R/O.2-71, RAMANAIAH PETA,YEDLAPADU VILLAGE
MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH
COURT
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,AT
AMARAVATI.
2. GUNTUPALLI
SAI
MOUNICA,
W/O.
KANNEGANTI
SARATH
CHANDRA,AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS R/O.D.NO.1-34-203, NEAR
MADHARSA,MARUTHI NAGAR GUNTUR TOWN AND GUNTUR
DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court Quash the Proceedings in Crime No.06 of
2026 dated 04.01.2026 on the file of Ediapadu Police Station Palnadu District registered against the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased dispense with the filing of the certified Copy of FIR
in Crime No.06 of 2026 dated 04.01.2026 on the file of Ediapadu Police Station Palnadu District and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2026
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased o stay of all further proceedings including arrest of the petitioners/Accused Nos 1 to 3 in Crime No.06 of 2026 dated 04.01.2026 on the file of Edlapadu Police Station Palnadu District pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. MARELLA RADHA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
2. BALAJI VEMULA
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6840 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
1
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This petition is filed to quash the proceedings in Crime No.6 of 2026 dated 04.01.2026 on the file of Edlapadu Police Station, Palnadu District.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. As seen from the record, severe allegations are leveled against the petitioners in the report given by the respondent No.2 and the said report is registered as a case in Crime No.6 of 2026 of the offence under Sections 75(2), 77, 127(2), 79, 308(2), 351(2), 324(2) r/w 3(5) of BNS Act. All the offences alleged against the petitioners are within seven years of imprisonment.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submitted that very grave allegations are leveled against the petitioners.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this is the 4th report given by the respondent No.2 and she has been keep on giving reports and the said reports have been registered against the petitioners.
6. This is not the proper time to go through the merits of the case. Learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, fairly submitted that this petition may be disposed of by giving direction to the Station House Officer, Edlapadu Police Station, Palnadu District, to follow the procedure under BNS coupled with the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar vs. State of
Bihar & Another1 as the punishment for the alleged offences is within seven years. Basing on the material collected during investigation, the investigating officer can proceed in accordance with law.
7. In the result, this Criminal Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Edlapadu Police Station, Palnadu District to follow the procedure under BNS coupled with the guidelines issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Arnesh Kumar (supra).
As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
20.08.2026 Vns