Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2136/2026 of V. K. V. Prasad Vs Sri Kantilal Dande on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2136/2026 Between: 1. V. K. V. PRASAD, S/O SRI M RAMA RAO, R/O D.NO.2-18, NELATURU VILLAGE, CHAGALLU
APHC010271322026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2136/2026
Between:
1. V. K. V. PRASAD, S/O SRI M RAMA RAO, R/O D.NO.2-18, NELATURU VILLAGE, CHAGALLU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI KANTILAL DANDE, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
ROADS
AND
BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI S B V REDDY GARU, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT
OF ROADS AND BUILDINGS, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
3. SRI G KANTHU, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, DEPARTMENT OF
ROADS
AND
BUILDINGS,
RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM,
EAST
GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
FINANCE
AND
PLANNING,
SECRETARIAT
BUILDINGS,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents herein for the willful, deliberate and wanton violation of the order dated 10.02.2026 passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.29535 of 2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVASRI ROSHAN KANCHARLA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
2. Y BALAJI
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.2136 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents furnished letter dated 20.08.2026, which forms part of record, it indicates that payment was made to the petitioner on 23.07.2026.
3. Basing on the letter furnished by the respondents, the Contempt Case is closed at present. If the same is disputed by the petitioner, the Contempt Case will be reopened without filing any application by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 20.08.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.2136 of 2026
20.08.2026 KBN