Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3814/2025 of Killi Ramana, Vs Sri Peeyush Kumar, IAS, on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3814/2025 Between: 1. KILLI RAMANA,, S/O. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC CONTRACTOR, R/O. KORUVADA, K KOTAPADU,
APHC010657462025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3814/2025
Between:
1. KILLI RAMANA,, S/O. RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC
CONTRACTOR,
R/O.
KORUVADA,
K
KOTAPADU,
VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, PINCODE 531022
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
(R-2)
2. SRI
KETAN
GARG
IAS,
COMMISSIONER,
GREATER
VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. (R-5)
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may please to direct notices to the Respondents herein and punish them for contempt of courts of the Honble High court for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Honble Court dated 09.09.2025 passed in WP No.24034 of 2025 under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. MODAPOTHULA SUMALATHA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.3814 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.24034 of 2025, dated 09.09.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 20.08.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.3814 of 2025 Date: 20.08.2026
KGM