Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3218/2025 of RONGALI NARAYANA APPALA NAIDU Vs HARENDRA PRASAD, IAS on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3218/2025 Between: 1. RONGALI NARAYANA APPALA NAIDU, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR,
APHC010585262025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3218/2025
Between:
1. RONGALI
NARAYANA
APPALA
NAIDU,
S/O.
LATE
SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O.F.NO.402, SARADA
KUTEER,
VISAKHAPATNAM,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. HARENDRA
PRASAD
IAS,
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. SRI
KETHAN
GARG
I
A
S,
COMMISSIONER,
GRATER
VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. SRI K SANTHI RAJ, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER - II, GRATER
VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. SRI
PEEYUSH
KUMAR
I
A
S,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, STATE OF ANDHRA
PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under the Contempt of Court Act for willful and deliberate disobedience of the orders of this honorable court in W.P.NO.18678 of 2025 Dt.22.07.2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. C SUBODH
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. RAMA RAO KOCHIRI
2. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.3218 OF 2025
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18678 of 2025, dated 22.07.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case.
2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, nothing would further survive for consideration in this contempt case.
3. Recording the same, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 20.08.2026 KGM
CONTEMPT CASE No.3218 of 2025 Date: 20.08.2026
KGM