Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/7396/2023 of TUMMI MURALI KRISHNA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 19 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7396/2023 Between: 1. TUMMI MURALI KRISHNA, S/O NAGABHUSAN RAO, AGE-30, R/O 9- 24-8/10, FLAT NO.10,
APHC010489642023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE 20th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. TUMMI MURALI KRISHNA, S/O NAGABHUSAN RAO, AGE-30, R/O 9- 24-8/10, FLAT
NO.10,
PRANTOSHINI
APARTMENT,
C.B.M
COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM,
2. TUMMI NAGA BHUSAN RAO (DIED), S/O (L) APPALA SWAMY, AGE
62, R/O 9-24-8/10, FLAT NO. 10, PRANTOSHINI APARTMENT, C.B.M
COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, SINCE PETITIONER/ACCUSED
NO.2 IS DIED, CRIMINAL PETITION AGAINST PETITIONER
NO.2/ACCUSED NO.2 IS DISMISSED AS ABATED, AS PER THE
COURT ORDER DATED 05.05.2026 IN CRL.P.NO.7396 OF 2023.
3. TUMMI RAMULAMMA,, W/O NAGA BHUSAN RAO, AGE-50, R/O 9- 24-8/10, FLAT
NO.10,
PRANTOSHINI
APARTMENT,
C.B.M
COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. TUMMI GANESH,, S/O NAGABHUSAN RAO, AGE-30, S/O T.NAGA
BHUSANA RAO, WORKING AS HEAD CONSTABLE, RACHAKONDA, TELANGANA STATE, REISDENT OF HYDERABAD.
5. VEMPATAPU PARVATHI,, W/O VENKATA RAVI KUMAR, AGE-37
YEARS, WORKING AS VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, RESIDENT
OF DOR NO.4-8-81, MARUTHINAGAR, 2ND LANE, DOLAPETA, RAJAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P, NELAPADU, AMARAVATI,
GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. TUMMI MOHITHA, W/O MURALI KRISHNA, AGED . 23 YEARS, R/O
D.NO. 9-24-8/10, FLAT NO. 10, PRANTOSHINI APARTMENT, CBM
COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtmay be pleased to quash CC No. 1862 of 2022 on the file of the Honourable 1st Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vishakhapatnam against the Petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 5 herein for the alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 325 r/w. 34 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all further proceedings in CC
No. 1862 of 2022 on the file of the Honourable 1st Additional. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vishakhapatnam against the Petitioners /Accused No. 1 to 5 herein for the alleged offences under Sections 498A, 323, 325 r/w.
34 IPC and Section 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1. S.V.S.S.SIVA RAM
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Ms Puppala Sneha Lattha, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri S.V.S.S. Siva Ram, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this matter arose out of marital disputes between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and the alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 406, 323 of the Indian Penal Code r/w. Section 3 & 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. She further submits that both parties are going to settle their dispute before the trial court and seeks permission to withdraw this present Criminal Petition and to that affect memo dated 19.08.2026 has also been filed. Recorded the contents of memo and satisfied the reasons mentioned in it.
2. In the result, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to both the parties to settle their dispute before the trial court. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J
Date: 20.08.2026 BSM
Date: 20.08.2026 BSM