Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/808/2012 of KETHRI UMAPATHI Vs K. NAGABHUSHANAMMA on 18 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A . HARI HARANADHA SARMA CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 808 OF 2012 Between: 1. KETHRI UMAPATHI, S/o Raghavaiah, Retired Employee R/o D.No. 2-805,
APHC010620822012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 808 OF 2012
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KETHRI UMAPATHI, S/o Raghavaiah, Retired Employee R/o D.No. 2-805, Kondamitta Street, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND
1. K NAGABHUSHANAMMA, W/o Umapathi, R/o D.No. 2-570-1, Kondamitta Street, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. ...Respondent Appeal Under Section_____against ordersappeal against the Order and decree in HMOP No. 49 of 2011 dt. 20-6-2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasthi, Chittoor District. Counsel for the Petitioner: P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order:
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed aggrieved by the order passed in H.M.O.P.No.49/2011 dated 20.6.2012 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. Said H.M.O.P was filed by both husband and wife under Section 13(B) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. While considering the matter, the 2nd petitioner therein being wife has opposed and contended that she has not given any consent for mutual divorce. Aggrieved by the same, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed by the husband. Notice has been ordered to the appellant through Registry as learned counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant is no more. Notice was received by the appellant but he did not choose to appear before this Court either in person or by engaging a counsel. Hence the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in this case, shall also stand closed.
__________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
__________________________________ JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA 19.8.2026 RD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.808 of 2012 19.8.2026 RD