Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/23244/2023 of PUPPALA RAMA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 18 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3573] WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 23244/2023 Between: 1. PUPPALA RAMA RAO, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, PEDANA MUNCIPALITY, R/O. FLAT NO. T8,
APHC010448492023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 19th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23244/2023
Between:
1. PUPPALA RAMA RAO, S/O RANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, PEDANA MUNCIPALITY, R/O. FLAT NO. T8, SHIRDI SAI
APARTMENTS, BATUSUMUDI VILAAGE, BHIMAVARAM,534201, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION
AND
URBAN
DEVELOPMENT,
A.P
SECRETARIAT,
AMARAVATI,GUNTUR
DISTRICT ,ANDHRA PRADESH, 522238.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER
AND
DIRECTOR
OF
MUNICIPAL
ADMINISTRATION, , PRIME HILL CREST, 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DGP
OFFICE, BESIDE ULTRATECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM
VILLAGE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DIST ANDHRA PRADESH-
522502.
3. THE COMMISSIONER, BHIMAVARAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
TOWN
HALL
RD,
GANDHINAGAR,WEST
GODAVARI
DIST
BHIMAVARAM, 534201, ANDHRA PRADESH- 534202.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent in not
considering the representation submitted by the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 23-12-2022, Submitted by the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 23-12-2022 and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES IV
2. K SREEDHARA MURTHY (SC for Municipalities and Municipal Corporation services)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The Writ Petition is filed for the following relief:
“…pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondent in not considering the representation submitted by the petitioner is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondent No 2 to pass appropriate orders on the representation dated 23122022 Submitted by the petitioner and to pass…”
2. Ms K. Harshitha, learned counsel representing on behalf of Sri K. V. Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition with a liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition with more comprehensive grounds and pleadings.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as sought for. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, shall stand closed.
Interim orders granted earlier if any, also shall stand closed.
________________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Dated: 19.08.2026
BSM
Writ Petition No. 23244 of 2023
Date: 19.08.2026
BSM