Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/17876/2026 of Jyothi Diagnostics Centre Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 17 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 18 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 17876/2026 BETWEEN: 1. JYOTHI DIAGNOSTICS CENTRE, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SMT. DATLA UMADEVI, W/o. D. SATYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS D.No.
APHC010324812026
IN THE H
(
TUESDAY
THE HONOURABLE S
WRIT
BETWEEN:
1. JYOTHI DIAGNO
PROPRIETOR
D. SATYANARAYA
6-13, OLD HIGHW
S. RAYAVARAM (M
1. THE STATE OF A
SECRETARY, H
DEPARTMENT, S
GUNTUR DISTRIC
2. THE DISTRICT CO
DISTRICT, ANAKA
3. THE DISTRICT ME
(DISTRICT REGIS
ANAKAPALLI DIST
4. THE DIRECTOR O
GOLLAPUDI, VIJA
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR
T PETITION No. 17876/2026
STICS CENTRE, REPRESENTED B
SMT.
DATLA
UMADEVI,
ANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
WAY, BESIDE LORRY OFFICE, ADDU
M), ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT- 531083.
...PETIT
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRIN
HEALTH, MEDICAL ANDFAMILY WE
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMAR
CT.522238
OLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, ANAK
APALLI.531001
EDICAL AND HEALTH OFFICER DM AN
STERING AUTHORITY UNDER APMCE
TRICT, ANAKAPALLI.531001
OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND FAMILY WE
AYAWADA, NTR DISTRICT.521225
...RESPONDE
R RAO
BY ITS
W/o.
S D.No.
UROAD,
TIONER
NCIPAL
ELFARE
RAVATI,
KAPALLI
ND HO,
E ACT),
LFARE,
ENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents, particularly the 3rd Respondent, in suspending and continuing the sealing/closure of the Petitioners diagnostic establishment pursuant to proceedings Rc.No.
Spl.(2)/APMCE/DEMO/2025 dated 27.11.2025, and in failing to consider and dispose of the Petitioner's compliance submissions dated 23.02.2026and 24.02.2026,as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable, opposed to the APMCE Act, 2002 and the Rules made thereunder, contrary to principles of natural justice and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and consequently direct the Respondents to forthwith revoke the suspension, de-seal the premises and permit the Petitioner to resume operations under APMCE
Registration No. 1649, and pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.SUNKARA RAJENDRA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri J. Suhas Kiran, learned counsel, represented on behalf of Sri Sunkara Rajendra Prasad, learned counsel on record for the petitioner and stated that the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous and the same is endorsed on the case bundle.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 18.08.2026
Harin
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 17876 of 2026
Date: 18-08-2026
Harin