Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15403/2013 of SMT.P. SURYA KUMARI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT Vs SPL OFFR CUM COMP AUTH, URBAN LAND CEILING & REG.,VISAKHA&2 on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

APHC010058722013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15403/2013 Between: 1. SMT.P. SURYA KUMARI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,

HN, J

W.P.No.15403_2013

APHC010058722013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 18th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 15403/2013

Between:

1. SMT.P.

SURYA

KUMARI,

VISAKHAPATNAM

DISTRICT,

W/O.P.RANGA,

AGED

YEARS,

R/O.DR.NO.58-15-66/1,

SANTHINAGAR, NAD KOTHA ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 009.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. SPL OFFR CUM COMP AUTH URBAN LAND CEILING REG

VISAKHA2, URBAN LAND CEILING & REGULATION, O/O.THE

DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MAHARANIPET, VISAKAHPATNAM.

2. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS

SECRETARY,

REVENUE

(UC-I)

DEPT.,

AP

SECRETARIAT,

HYDERABAD.

3. THE

CHIEF

COMMISSIONER

OF

LAND

ADMINISTRATION,

NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents to consider the representations dated 14.10.2010 and 09.1.2013 for rectification of the mistake in the endorsement of the 1st Respondent in GE1/6/06 & 7/06/B2, dated 9.06.2009 and issue appropriate rectified endorsement in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 18609 OF 2013

HN, J

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider the representations dated 14-10-2010 and 9-1-2013 of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders, pending disposal of the above W.P. before this Hon'ble Court, pending disposal of the W.P. before this Hon'ble Court, IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to condoned the delay 72 f days in resubmitting the interlocutory application in lA SR No.36604 of 2026 in WP No. 15403 of 2013

and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2026

in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the proposed respondent as respondent No. 4 in WP No.15403 of 2013 and in all lAs as she is necessary party to the proceedings and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. M SRI ATCHYUT

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE

HN, J

W.P.No.15403_2013

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the action of respondent No.1 in not considering the representation of the petitioner, dated 09.01.2013.

2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner sought certain modifications and rectifications in the endorsement dated 09.06.2009. In this regard, the petitioner submitted a representation seeking the indulgence of respondent No.1 to issue necessary orders by duly demarcating in the FMB of Survey No.19/2 an extent of Ac.2.30 cents from north to south, belonging to Sri P. Ammajamma, wife of late P.Rama Murthy and mother of P.Surya Kumari, as non-surplus land and not covered under ULC and (R) Act 1976.

3. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner has also filed a memo dated 28.07.2026, placing certain objections on record.

4. Considering the limited scope of the writ petition, wherein the petitioner is only seeking a direction to respondent No.1 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner and take appropriate further steps, this writ petition can be disposed off by directing respondent No.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, by granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and permitting the petitioner to produce any further documents, if necessary.

HN, J

W.P.No.15403_2013

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:18.08.2026 NKA

Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No

HN, J

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 15403 of 2013 Date: 18.08.2026

NKA

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead