Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24898/2011 of Pratap Pathade Vs The State Bank of India, on 16 August 2026
ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No. W.P. Nos.24898 of 2011 and 7672 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 09. 17.08.2026 BKM,J W.P.No.24898 of 2011 The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate order) ______ BKM,J NNN
APHC010646202011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 24898/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. PRATAP PATHADE, S/O SRI B.G. PATHADE PROBATIONARY OFFICER (NOW UNDER TERIMINATION ORDERS), STATE BANK OF INDIA, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, HR DEPARTMENT, BANK STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD.
2. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, KOTI, HYDERABAD.
3. THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, CIRCLE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, HR DEPARTMENT, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, BANK STREET, KOTI, HYDERABAD.
4. THE MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, GUNTUR MAIN BRANCH, GUNTUR.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, ORder or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS by declaring the action of the respondents in terminating the services of the petitioner during the period of probation by way of a stigamatic order communicated vide HRD/L&D/511 dated 14.6.2011 (Served on 29.8.20110 by the 3rd respondent as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and hold that the petitioner is entitled to be reinstated and continued in service as probationary officer in the respondent bank with all consequential benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WVMP 4694 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 06-09-2011 passed in WPMP No.30625 of 2011 in WP No.24898 of 2011 IA NO: 2 OF 2011(WPMP 30625 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 17082 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to hear the writ petition at the arliest possible time convenient to this Hon'ble Court Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D LINGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K B RAMANNA DORA
The Court made the following Order:
Both the learned counsels submit that, nothing survives in this matter in view of the withdrawal of the termination order by the bank vide letter dated 19.04.2013. The said letter of the bank shall be made as part of the court record.
2. In view of the same, as no cause survives, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 17.08.2026 NNN