Andhra Pradesh High Court

MACMA/1848/2008 of UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PUNE. Vs SMT. K. GOWRAMMA AND 3 OTHERS on 16 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1848/2008 Between: UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PUNE., REP. BY

APHC010182282008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1848/2008

Between:

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PUNE., REP. BY

ITS BRANCH MANAGER, BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA

INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, PUNE,

...APPELLANT

AND

1. SMT

K

GOWRAMMA

AND

OTHERS,

W/O

LATE

K.SREENIVASULU

R/O

D.NO.6-220,

GUDIYATHAM

ROAD,

PALAMANER POST AND MANDAL,

2. K KIRAN KUMAR, S/O LATE K.SREENIVASULU R/O D.NO.6-220, GUDIYATHAM ROAD, PALAMANER POST AND MANDAL,

3. K LATHA KUMARI, D/O LATE K.SREENIVASULU R-2 AND R-3

ARE DECLARED AS MAJORS IN IA.NO.570 &571/05. R/O

D.NO.6-220, GUDIYATHAM ROAD, PALAMANER POST AND

MANDAL,

4. SMT SUNITHA SHETTY, W/O PRAKASH SHETTY OWNER OF

LORRY KA-01/A-0173, R/O 77- UNITED BUILDING, JCM ROAD, KALASIPALYAM

...RESPONDENT(S):

Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court Counsel for the Appellant:

A MALATHI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

K S GOPALA KRISHNAN

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

1. Despite of respondents/claimants represented by the learned counsel on record, none appeared for them.

2. Sri Vutla Srinivasu, learned counsel would submit that the counsel on record for the appellant is no more and he is representing the appellant/insurance company as instructed. He further submits that he intends to withdraw the present appeal.

3. Having regard to the above submissions, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.

________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Date: 17.08.2026 Krs

THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

M.A.C.M.A.No.1848 of 2008

( JUDGMNET )

DATE: 17.08.2026

Krs

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead