Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/1826/2008 of THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, ANANTAPUR. Vs SMT. JUTUR PRAMEELA AND 4 OTHERS on 16 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1826/2008 Between: THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, ANANTAPUR.,
APHC010458512008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1826/2008
Between:
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, ANANTAPUR., REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, ANANTAPUR.
...APPELLANT
AND
1. SMT JUTUR PRAMEELA AND 4 OTHERS, W/O SRI GANGI
REDDY R/O VANKARAKUNTA VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL.
2. JUTUR SAINAGESH, S/O SRI GANGI REDDY MINOR, REP. BY
GUARDIAN NF MOTHER P1 R/O VANKARAKUNTA VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL.
3. SMT
JUTUR
VENGAMMA,
W/O
SRI
MUNIREDDY
R/O
VANKARAKUNTA VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL.
4. SRI JUTUR MUNIREDDY, S/O SRI JAYARAMIREDDY R/O
VANKARAKUNTA VILLAGE, NALLAMADA MANDAL.
5. SRI T SREENIVASA REDDY, S/O SRI T.V.VENKATARAMI REDDY, MAJOR, HINDU OWNER OF AUTO, YERRA MASUPPALLI
VILLAGE,
K.S.R.ENGINEERING
COLLEGE,
CUDDAPAH
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court set aside the Order dated 24th February, 2006 in OP.NO. 87 of 2003 on the file of the MACT [ V Addl. District Judge] FTC Anantapur.
Counsel for the Appellant:
KALPANA EKBOTE
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:
1. Despite of service of notice on the respondents, they did not turn up.
2. Sri Paladugu Ganesh, learned counsel for the appellant/insurance company would submit that this appeal is filed challenging the impugned order on the point of quantum of compensations awarded for an amount of Rs.2,20,000/- against the claim of Rs.2,50,000/- in the case of death and he intends to withdraw the present appeal.
3. Having regard to the above submissions, the M.A.C.M.A. is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier if any, stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any, stand closed.
________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 17.08.2026 Krs
THE HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
M.A.C.M.A.No.1826 of 2008
( JUDGMNET )
DATE: 17.08.2026
Krs