Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2782/2025 of P. SIVAMOHAN REDDY Vs Thalari Venkateswarlu, on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2782 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-31 [3581] P. Sivamohan Reddy and Others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Thalari Venkateswarlu ...Contemnor ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14th August 2026 Present :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010473942025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2782 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-31
P. Sivamohan Reddy and Others ...Petitioner(s) Vs. Thalari Venkateswarlu ...Contemnor ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14th August 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner(s): Ms. B. Nirupama representing Ms. Devineni Radha Rani Advocate for Contemnor(s): Mr. Venkata Rama Rao Kota, SC for APSPDCL LISA GILL, CJ: This petition has been filed alleging contempt on account of non- compliance of order, dated 01.04.2025, whereby respondent No.2 had been directed to pass an appropriate speaking order after affording opportunity of hearing to concerned within three weeks. Upon such order being passed, it shall be open to parties to avail remedies in accordance with law and that till such appropriate decision is taken, no coercive steps be taken against appellant.
2. Learned counsel for respondents on last date of hearing had stated that impugned order has since been complied with, appropriate order was passed
CC_2782_2025 and no coercive steps were taken in the interregnum. Thereafter, W.P. Nos.23681 of 2025 and 18800 of 2026 have been filed by parties. Learned counsel for petitioners had sought time to seek instructions. Today, there is a request for adjournment with no instructions forthcoming on the premise that arguing counsel is indisposed.
3. However, in view of specific and categorical assertion by learned counsel for respondents, we do not find any justification for continuation of present proceedings, which are accordingly closed with liberty to petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in this case in the event of any incorrect fact being brought before us. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
LISA GILL, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
akn
Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable
: Yes / No
CC_2782_2025 HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
C.C. No:2782 of 2025 DATE : 14.08.2026
AKN