Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/39380/2016 of Shaik Saleem Basha, S/o. S.A. Shukur, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION N Between: 1. SHAIK SALEEM BASHA, S/ RESIDENT OF DOOR N CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 2. NAZIMUNNISA, W/o.SHAIK SALEEM BASHA, OCC: HOUSEWIFE, RESIDENT OF DOOR

APHC010571382016

IN THE H

(

FRIDAY, T

THE HONOURAB

WRIT

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SHAIK SALEEM B RESIDENT OF DO CHITTOOR DISTRICT

2. NAZIMUNNISA, W/o. RESIDENT OF DOO CHITTOOR DISTRICT

3. SHAIK MOHAMMED OCC: BUSINESS, R ROAD, PILER, CHITT

4. MOHAMMED AABIR, RESIDENT OF DOO CHITTOOR DISTRICT

1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY, REVEN VELAGAMPUDI, GUN

2. THE DISTRICT COLL

3. THE DISTRICT REGIS

4. THE TAHSILDAR, PIL

5. THE SUBREGISTRAR

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURY PETITION No: 39380 of 2016 BASHA, S/o.S.A.SHUKUR, OCC: B OOR No.11-262, PRAKASAM ROAD T. .SHAIK SALEEM BASHA, OCC: HOU OR No. 11-262, PRAKASAM ROAD T. D ASEER, S/o. SHAIK SALEEM RESIDENT OF DOOR No.11-262, PR TOOR DISTRICT. S/O. SHAIK SALEEM BASHA, OCC: B OR No. 11-262, PRAKASAM ROAD T. ...PETIT AND NDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS, P NUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT B NTUR DISTRICT. ECTOR CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTR STRAR CHITTOOR CHITTOOR DISTR LER MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. R PILER CHITTOOR DISTRICT, - ...RESPON

YA USINESS, D, PILER, USEWIFE, D, PILER, BASAH, RAKASAM USINESS, D, PILER, TIONER(S) PRINCIPAL BUILDING, RICT, - ICT, - NDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner(S): Mr.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP)

2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

The Court made the following order: In view of the Letter dated 06.08.2026, addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the Memo dated 12.08.2026, filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition, permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

Date: 14.08.2026 BLV

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA

W.P.No.39380 of 2016 Dt: 14.08.2026

BLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead