Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/19447/2026 of TIRUPATHI CHENGAIAH Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 13 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM WRIT PETITION NO: 19447 OF 2026 Between: 1. TIRUPATHI CHENGAIAH, S/o.

APHC010364622026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. TIRUPATHI CHENGAIAH, S/o. Ramanaiah, Aged About 50 years, R/o. Gunapadu Village, Chettamuru Mandal, Tirupathi District. ...Petitioner AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur.

2. Director General of Police, Andhra Pradesh State.

3. The Commissioner of Police, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh State.

4. The Station House Officer, Chittamaru Police Station, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, directing the respondent Nos.02 to 04 to produce the Petitioner's Son namely Tirupathi Vinay Kumar, S/o. Chengaiah, aged About 24 years, R/o. Gunapadu Village, Chittamaru

Mandal, Chittoor District before this Hon'ble Court, which is registered FIR No. 39 of 2026, dated. 05/04/2026 by the same Respondent No. 04 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: MALLELA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondents: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following order:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand)

Learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.

2. Permission is granted.

3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

____________________________ JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

Dated: 14.08.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND &

Dated: 14.08.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead