Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2160/2025 of BANDI PUSHPA DURGA Vs S. PRASANNA SREE on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2160 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-30 [3581] Bandi Pushpa Durga ...Petitioner Vs. S Prasanna Sree ...Contemnor ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14th August 2026 Present : Advocate for
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010132452025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2160 of 2025 Bench Sr.No:-30
Bandi Pushpa Durga ...Petitioner Vs. S Prasanna Sree ...Contemnor ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 14th August 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner(s): Mr. M. S. P. Reddy representing Ms. Talari Rajeswari Advocate for Contemnor(s): Mr. Gadde Koti Nagulu, SC For Adikavi nannaya University LISA GILL, CJ: This petition has been filed alleging contempt of order, dated 04.12.2024, which reads as under: “The petitioner has some grievance against respondent No.5 which has not been considered by respondent No.3 – Adikavi Nannayya University. We dispose of this WP(PIL) with a direction to respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner if the same is filed yet again within two weeks from today. Appropriate orders be passed in accordance with law within two months thereafter. No order as to costs.”
2. Counter has been filed on behalf of respondent wherein it is stated that petitioner herself did not file any representation as has been directed by order dated 04.12.2024. In detailed counter filed, it is also mentioned that University
CC_2160_2025 had acted promptly and appropriately on complaint dated 09.08.2024, filed by petitioner. Petitioner/complainant had refused to join proceedings before three-member committee. Details thereof have also been mentioned in said counter.
3. Be that as it may, learned counsel for petitioner is unable to deny that such representation in compliance of order dated 04.12.2024, was not submitted, nor is there any such pleading in present petition.
4. Keeping in view above, no contempt as alleged is made out. Rule is accordingly discharged. Contempt case is dismissed. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
LISA GILL, CJ
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J
akn
Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable
: Yes / No
CC_2160_2025 HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
C.C. No:2160 of 2025 DATE : 14.08.2026
AKN