Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2226/2026 of Mudunuru Venkata Ramana Raju Vs Thotakura Venkata Lakshmi on 13 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2226 OF 2026 Between: 1. Mudunuru Venkata Ramana Raju, S/o LateM. Bairagi Raju, Aged 63 yrs , D.No.43-14-6 ,Subbalakshmi
APHC010416052026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE 14th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. Mudunuru Venkata Ramana Raju, S/o LateM. Bairagi Raju, Aged 63 yrs , D.No.43-14-6 ,Subbalakshmi Nagar Railway New Colony Visakhapatnam.
...Petitioner
AND
1. Thotakura Venkata Lakshmi, W/o T. Varaha Narasimha Raju , Aged 60 yrs, Flat No.501 ,S R K Towers, HDFC Bank back side, Sal Nagar, Saluru Vizianagaram District.
2. Mudunuru Surya Kumari, W/o Late Balragiraju, Aged 88 yrs, Flat No.501 , SRK TowersHDFC Bank back side, Sal Nagar, Saluru Vizianagaram District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toThe above named Petitioner begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition having been aggrieved non disposal of the case in O.S.No. 42/2021, on the file of Principal Civil Judge Senior Division Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased dispense with the Certified Copy of the Plaint Copy in O.S.No.42/2021 ,on the file of the Principal Civil Judge(Senior Division) Visakhapatnam.
Counsel for the Petitioner: R SIVA SAI SWARUP
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following order:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by non-disposal of O.S.No.42 of 2021 on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Visakhapatnam.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that O.S.No.42 of 2021 was filed by the respondents herein before Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner who is the defendant in the suit aged about 63 years and the respondents who are the plaintiffs in the suit aged 60 years and 88 years respectively. Hence, the learned counsel contends that considering the advanced age of the parties of the suit, they are entitled for expeditious disposal of the suit.
3. This Court accepted the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. Admittedly, the parties to the suit on both sides are senior citizens aged above 60 years. This High Court both on administrative and judicial sides, has issued instructions and passed orders for the expeditious disposal of the cases in which senior citizens are parties.
5. In view of the same, in our considered view, this Civil Revision Petition can be disposed of with certain directions to the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam to meet the interest of justice.
6. Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.42 of 2021, pending on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge’s Court, Visakhapatnam, as expeditiously as possible, by following due process of law.
7. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Dated : 14.08.2026 TM
Dated : 14.08.2026 TM