Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3955/2013 of M/s. Seetharamanjaneya Saw Mill, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 13 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION No.3955 of 2013 Bench Sr.No:-8 [3584] M/s. Seetharamanjaneya Saw Mill ...Petitioner Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 14th August
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
APHC010520202013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
WRIT PETITION No.3955 of 2013 Bench Sr.No:-8
M/s. Seetharamanjaneya Saw Mill ...Petitioner Vs. The Government of Andhra Pradesh and others ...Respondents ********** CORAM : THE CHIEF JUSTICE LISA GILL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 14th August 2026 Present : Advocate for Petitioner : Sri K. Sarva Bhouma Rao Advocate for Respondents : Learned G.P. for Forests
LISA GILL, CJ.
Learned counsel for respondents submits that present writ petition wherein suspension of saw mill license of petitioner is challenged, is rendered infructuous. As on 20.01.2014, license of petitioner was cancelled.
2. W.P.No.4034 of 2014 filed by petitioner, challenging said cancellation, was allowed with following observation:- “In view of the above respective submissions of both the counsel, this writ petition is allowed setting aside the impugned proceedings in R.C.No.5184/1998-A2(S-4), dated 20.01.2014, issued by the 4th respondent. It is made clear that so long as the petitioner industry complies with the parameters fixed in Rule 8 of G.O.Ms.No.48, dated 08.05.2018, the petitioner can run its industry without the necessity
HCJ & CGR, J W.P.No.3955 of 2013
of obtaining license from the Forest Department. It is further made clear that the respondent authorities right to inspect the petitioner’s industry periodically to check whether the petitioner’s industry satisfies the parameters fixed in Rule 8 of G.O.Ms.No.48, dated 08.05.2018 or not and to take necessary action in case of violation is preserved. No costs.”
3. Learned counsel for petitioner affirms that present writ petition is rendered infructuous.
4. Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, including I.A.No.1 of 2021 shall stand closed. LISA GILL, CJ
CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J AMD
Whether the order is Speaking/Reasoned : Yes / No Whether the order is Reportable
: Yes / No
HCJ & CGR, J W.P.No.3955 of 2013
HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL, CHIEF JUSTICE & HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN
WRIT PETITION No.3955 of 2013
Dt:14.08.2026
AMD