Andhra Pradesh High Court

SA/1432/2004 of M/s Sairam Stone Supliers Vs Ch. Jhagan mohan Rao on 12 August 2026

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 1432 OF 2004 Between: 1. M/s Sairam Stone Supliers, rep. by Vankadara Chandra Mouli, S/o late Sankaraiah Managing Partner R/o

APHC010044022004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI

GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

SECOND APPEAL NO: 1432 OF 2004

Between:

1. M/s Sairam Stone Supliers, rep. by Vankadara Chandra Mouli, S/o late Sankaraiah Managing Partner R/o Poranki Vijayawada Rural Mandal.

2. Vankadara Chandra Mouli, S/o late Sankaraiah Business R/o Poranki Vijayawada Rural Mandal.

...Petitioners

AND

1. Ch Jhagan mohan Rao, S/o Madhavarao R/o 59-8-5, 2nd lane, Gayatri lane

2. V Subrahmanyam, So late Sankaraiah R/o KCP Colony, Bandar Road, Kanuru

...Respondents

Appeal under section ___________ against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2004(SAMP 12965 OF 2004

Page 1 of 3

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased grant stay of all further proceedings including execution of decree and Judgment dated 28-10-04 in AS.No.7/01 on the file of the Court of the VIII Addl.

District and Sessions Judge [Fast Track Court] at Vijayawada setting aside the decree and Judgment dated 17-11-99 in OS.NO.49/91 on the file of the Court of II Addl. Senior Civil Judge at Vijayawada pending disposal of the abve Second appeal in this Hon'ble Court.

Counsel for the Petitioners: V S MALLIKHARJUNA

KULADEEP THOKA

Counsel for the Respondents: G V S MEHAR KUMAR

The Court made the following order:

Page 2 of 3

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO

SECOND APPEAL No.1432 of 2004

JUDGMENT:

Learned counsel for both sides is present.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mrs. K. Sarita, learned counsel representing Mr. V. S. Mallikharjuna Kuladeep Thoka, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties outside the Court, the appellants seek permission of this Court to withdraw the present second appeal and the same is endorsed on the bundle.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the present Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.

_______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO 13.08.2026 LSP

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead