Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/1081/2015 of SRI GUDIVADA PRASAD RAO, ORISSA., Vs SMT. GUDIVADA VENKAT RAMA KUMARI, VIZIANAGARM & 2 OTRS - PP. on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

for orders : Date of pronouncement : 13-08-2026 Date of uploading : 13-08-2026 APHC010017672015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1081 OF 2015 Between: Sri

Date of reserved for orders :

Date of pronouncement : 13-08-2026

Date of uploading : 13-08-2026

APHC010017672015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

THURSDAY, THE 13th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1081 OF 2015

Between:

Sri Gudivada Prasad Rao, S/o. Late Ramana, aged 56 years, Hindu, Occ: Senior Commercial Goods Clerk, E.Co., railway, NALCO Project, Damanjodi, Orissa.

...Petitioner/ Respondent

AND

1.Smt Gudivada Venkat Rama Kumari,

W/o. Prasad Rao, Aged 40 years, Hindu,

Occ: House Hold, R/o. Plot. No.14,

Sainath Colony, Vizianagaram.

2.Gudivada Venkata Karthik, S/o. Prasada Rao, Aged 10 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Plot No.14, Sainath Colony, Vizianagaram.

(2nd respondent being minor represented by his natural guardian Mother the 1st respondent)

…Respondents/ Petitioners

3. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.

…Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: A S C BOSE

Counsel for the Respondents 1 & 2 : G RAMA GOPAL

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

The Court made the following order:

THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 1081 OF 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated 31.03.2015 made in F.C.O.P. No.8 of 2013 by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vizianagaram.

2. Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is no more and after his death, respondent No.1 has been receiving pension, as such this Criminal Revision Case may be dismissed as abated.

3. Recorded the said submission.

4. In the result, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated.

5. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J

13.08.2026 knl

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead