WP/22085/2021 of Basava Naga Veera Venkata Satya Krishna Simhadri @ Babu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 11 August 2026

1. BASAVA NAGA VEERA VENKATA SATYA KRISHNA SIMHADRI @ BABU,, S/O. LATE BASAVA PRABHAKARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. FIAT NO. B-3. SAI ANJANA AHLADAM APARTMENTS, NEAR RED BRIDGE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, AMALAPURAM MUNICIPALITY, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

3. 3SMT MAMIDIPALLY SATYAVATHAMMA, W/O.MAMIDIPALLY ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O.8-3-55, GANDI STREET, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more preferably in the nature of Writ jf Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in permitting the 3rd respondent herein for making illegal constructions on the plot which is not in existence as per layout No.44/98 without building permission in Sy.No.183/6 of Amalapuram Municipality, East GodavPri District and consequently direct the 2nd respondent take action against the 3rd respondent for making illegal constructions on tr. plot which is not in existence as per layout No.44/98 without building permis-ion in Sy.No.183/6 of Amalapuram Municipality, East Godavari District and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 02.08.2021 and 26.08.2021 respectively and take action against 3rd respondent for making illegal constructions in Sy.No.183/6 of Amalapuram Municipality, East ' Godavari District, in the interest of justice pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. K SAIRAM MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M MANOHAR REDDY (SC FOR MUNC AND MUNC CORP )

2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

The Court made the following Order:-

The petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondent No.2 in considering the representations of the petitioner dated 02.08.2021 and 26.08.2021, whereby the petitioner brought to the notice of respondent No.2 that respondent No.3 was undertaking unauthorised construction in Layout No.44/98. The petitioner seeks a direction to respondent No.2 to consider the said representations and pass appropriate orders.

2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that detailed counter is filed stating that a provisional notice dated 10.10.2021 was issued to respondent No.3. It is also submitted that respondent No.3 had applied online through APDPMS website by submitting the vacant land tax receipt, title documents and other relevant documents, along with an encumbrance certificate and undertaking, as required under the applicable Municipal law.

3. It is further submitted that the title dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.3 is the subject matter of proceedings before this Court and that the petitioner had earlier filed W.P.No.12201 of 2021 challenging the registration of the sale deed in favour of respondent No.3. The petitioner had also submitted representations, which were not considered by the respondents therein. Accordingly, the said writ petition was disposed of, directing the respondents to pass appropriate orders on the representations of the petitioner.

4. The 2nd respondent is not competent to adjudicate upon the title dispute between the petitioner and respondent No.3. If the parties have any dispute with regard to title, they are at liberty to invoke the jurisdiction of the appropriate forum.

5. In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, after affording an opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 12.08.2026 RSD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 22085/2021

12.08.2026 RSD