Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/931/2013 of LUKKA DURGA PRASAD Vs LUKKA DURGA BHAVANI on 11 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 931 OF 2013 Between: 1. LUKKA DURGA PRASAD, S/o Hari Babu, Private Employee, R/o
APHC010212512013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 931 OF 2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. LUKKA DURGA PRASAD, S/o Hari Babu, Private Employee, R/o D.No. 3C-9-18, Near Singara Swamy Temple, Western Street, Eluru, West Godavari District. ...Petitioner AND
1. LUKKA DURGA BHAVANI, W/o durga Prasad, D/o Mareedu Lakshmana Rao, Employee in Government Hospital, Eluru, R/o D.No.4-19, Vegavaram Village, Demduluru Mandal, West Godavari District. ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: SIVA SANKARA RAO BORRA Counsel for the Respondent: The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.931 OF 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) This appeal is filed by the husband/respondent aggrieved by the order dated 18.06.2013 passed in O.P.No.115 of 2012 by the Principal District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, wherein the learned Principal District Judge, after considering the matter on merits, dismissed the petition filed by the husband seeking restitution of conjugal rights against the wife.
2. While pending the appeal, learned counsel for both parties, on instructions, submitted that the parties have compromised the matter outside the Court and they are living separately and the appellant does not want to pursue the appeal.
3. Recording the said statement, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
_________________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Date: 12.08.2026 Ivd Whether the order is: Speaking Yes Reasoned No Reportable No Non-reportable Yes
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.931 of 2013
Dated: 12.08.2026
Ivd