Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/22749/2026 of YAMALA BHASKARA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 22749/2026 Between: 1. YAMALA BHASKARA RAO, S/O Y. RACHAYYA (LATE), AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC HOME GUARD, RIO.
APHC010420862026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 22749/2026
Between:
1. YAMALA BHASKARA RAO, S/O Y. RACHAYYA (LATE), AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC HOME GUARD, RIO.
NARSINGA RAO PETA,CHURSH POLICE QUARTERS, ANAKAPALLI, ANDHRAPRADESH- 531001
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME AFFAIRS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR, A.P-522237
2. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, GOVERNMENT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR, A.P-522503
3. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SHANKARAM VILLAGE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-531001.
4. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531001
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an order or direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring
the action of the Respondents in directing to retire from Service by 12.08.2026 instead of 12.08.2028 as per G.O.Ms.No. 15 Finance (HR.IV-FR AND LR) Department dt.31.01.2022 of the Government as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law besides violation of Art.14 AND
21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to continue the Petitioner till the petitioner reached 62
years of age in terms of G.O.Ms.No. 15 Finance (HR.IV-FR AND
LR) Department dt.31.01.2022 forthwith
IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner in service as Home Guard No. 10 till 12.08.2028
forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. B.K.CHAKRAVARTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
WRIT PETITION No.22749 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous. In that view, no orders are required to be passed.
2. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
3. No order as to costs.
4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 12.08.2026 chs
WRIT PETITION No.22749 of 2026 Date: 12.08.2026
chs