WP/14903/2026 of D RAMADEVI Vs THE STATE OF AP on 11 August 2026

1. D RAMADEVI, W/O. LATE D. PRAKASH, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 14-326, KADHAR MEERAN STREET, NEAR GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

2. Y. SUGUNA NAIDU,, W/O Y. SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO. 584, VIVEKANANDA NAGAR COLONY, KUKATPALLI, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522238

2. CHITTOOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL OFFICE BUILDING, NEAR NEW BUS STAND, CHITTOOR-517001

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Provisional Order bearing NO.8/1008/CTR/UC/2026 dated 04-05-2026 and the Confirmation Order bearing NO.8/1008/CTR/UC/2026 dated 19-05-2026 issued by the Respondent No.2 in respect of the Petitioners private property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.21 cents out of Ac. 0.61 cents situated in Sy.No.685, No.72 Chittoor Revenue Village, near Vellore-Chittoor Road, opposite Reliance Mart, Chittoor, Chittoor District, within the limits of Chittoor Municipal Corporation as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unreasonable, without jurisdiction, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, contrary to the A.P. Metropolitan Region and Urban Development Authorities Act, 2016 and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property and not to take any coercive steps for demolition except by following due process of law, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the operation of the Confirmation Order bearing NO.8/1008/CTR/UC/2026 dated 19-05-2026 of the Respondent No,2 including demolition of the property admeasuring an extent of Ac. 0.21 cents out of Ac. 0.61 cents situated in Sy.No.685, No.72 Chittoor Revenue Village, near Vellore- Chittoor Road, opposite Reliance Mart, Chittoor, Chittoor District, within the limits of Chittoor Municipal Corporation, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. SODUM ANVESHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In

2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

The Court made the following Order:

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in pursuance of the interim directions dated 28.05.2026, the 2nd respondent has passed speaking orders dated 08.06.2026 and that the subsequent orders would have to be challenged. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the subsequent proceedings, if so advised. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________ HARINATH.N,J RJS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION No:14903 of 2026

Dt: 12.08.2026

RJS