Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/3084/2008 of CHIGILIPALLI SATYAVATHI & 2 OTHERS Vs R. ADINARAYANARAO & 2 OTHERS on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3084/2008 Between: 1. CHIGILIPALLI SATYAVATHI & 2 OTHERS, W/O.
APHC010201082008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. CHIGILIPALLI SATYAVATHI & 2 OTHERS, W/O. BHASKARARAO
R/O. 36-53-61/A, REDDY KANCHARAPALEM, VIZAG.
2. CHIGILIPALLI BHASKARARAO, S/O. PEDA APPALANAIDU R/O. 36- 53-61/A, REDDY KANCHARAPALEM, VIZAG.
3. CH. MADANMOHAN, S/O. BHASKARARAO UNEMPLOYEE R/O. 36- 53-61/A, REDDY KANCHARAPALEM, VIZAG.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. R ADINARAYANARAO 2 OTHERS, S/O. CHINNAYYA R/O.
INDIRANAGAR,
V.
SEETHARAMARAJU
COLONY,
VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. M/S SARAT CHATTERJEE CO, MANAGER THE MANAGER, M/S.
SARAT CHATTERJEE & CO, 24-3-6, MAIN ROAD,
3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD, VIZAG BRANCH MANAGER
THE BRANCH MANAGER, UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD, VIZAG.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Court IA NO: 1 OF 2004(CMAMP 13798 OF 2004
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 157 days in preferring the appeal in the interest of justice or otherwise the petitioner will be put to serious and irreparable loss Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. M RAVINDRA BABU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The proceeding sheet dated 11.08.2026, would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.08.2026. UPS
Dt.12.08.2026
UPS