Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/185/2015 of Peddapalem Primary Agricultural Co- Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 185/2015 Between: 1. PEDDAPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-, OPERATIVE SOCIETY ( REGD.NO. B

APHC010328132015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO: 185/2015

Between:

1. PEDDAPALEM

PRIMARY

AGRICULTURAL

CO-,

OPERATIVE

SOCIETY ( REGD.NO. B B 24) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT

N.MANOHAR PRASAD, S/O. LATE VENKATARATNAM, AGED 53

YEARS,

R/O.

PEDDAPALEM,

PONNUR

MANDAL,

GUNTUR

DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.BY

ITS

PRINCIPLE

SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HYDERABAD.

2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICERFAC, COLLECTORATE

COMPOUND, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT

3. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER BAPATLA GUNTUR DIST, -

4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I, 0/O. THE SUB DIVISIONAL CO- OPERATIVE OFFICER, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus questioning the action of the respondents in proceeding with the inquiry by issuing summons dated 02-01-2015 without considering representation dated 29-10-2014 and without serving the copy of order of Inquiry under Sec.51 of A.P.co-operative societies Act 1964 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further pursuant to the impugned proceedings

IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 198 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed further pursunt to the summons dated 02-01-2015 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 980 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed with the enquiry pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP 981 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of summons dated 17.01.2015 as additional document IA NO: 7 OF 2015(WPMP 3258 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased clarify that "directing to consider and dispose of representation dated 29-10- 2014 by affording the president of the petitioner society personal hearing.The respondents are also directed to not to proceed with inquiry in pursuance of the impugned proceedings till the above directed process is completed by Respondent No.2 and his order communicated by the president of the petitioner" instead of "There shall be interim direction to consider the representation dated 29-102014 submitted by the petitioner by affording the president of the petitioners society a personal hearing.The respondents can proceed with the inquiry after disposing of the representation ['lade by the petitioner as afore said" and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

Heard Ms. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause raised in the writ petition would not survive.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 12.08.2026 ANI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

WRIT PETITION NO:185 of 2015

Dated: 12.08.2026

ANI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead