Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/185/2015 of Peddapalem Primary Agricultural Co- Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 11 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 185/2015 Between: 1. PEDDAPALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-, OPERATIVE SOCIETY ( REGD.NO. B
APHC010328132015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO: 185/2015
Between:
1. PEDDAPALEM
PRIMARY
AGRICULTURAL
CO-,
OPERATIVE
SOCIETY ( REGD.NO. B B 24) REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
N.MANOHAR PRASAD, S/O. LATE VENKATARATNAM, AGED 53
YEARS,
R/O.
PEDDAPALEM,
PONNUR
MANDAL,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.BY
ITS
PRINCIPLE
SECRETARY, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HYDERABAD.
2. THE DISTRICT COOPERATIVE OFFICERFAC, COLLECTORATE
COMPOUND, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
3. THE DIVISIONAL COOPERATIVE OFFICER BAPATLA GUNTUR DIST, -
4. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I, 0/O. THE SUB DIVISIONAL CO- OPERATIVE OFFICER, BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus questioning the action of the respondents in proceeding with the inquiry by issuing summons dated 02-01-2015 without considering representation dated 29-10-2014 and without serving the copy of order of Inquiry under Sec.51 of A.P.co-operative societies Act 1964 is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of A.P. Cooperative Societies Act 1964 and consequently direct the respondents not to proceed further pursuant to the impugned proceedings
IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP 198 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed further pursunt to the summons dated 02-01-2015 pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 980 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to proceed with the enquiry pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 3 OF 2015(WPMP 981 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the copy of summons dated 17.01.2015 as additional document IA NO: 7 OF 2015(WPMP 3258 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased clarify that "directing to consider and dispose of representation dated 29-10- 2014 by affording the president of the petitioner society personal hearing.The respondents are also directed to not to proceed with inquiry in pursuance of the impugned proceedings till the above directed process is completed by Respondent No.2 and his order communicated by the president of the petitioner" instead of "There shall be interim direction to consider the representation dated 29-102014 submitted by the petitioner by affording the president of the petitioners society a personal hearing.The respondents can proceed with the inquiry after disposing of the representation ['lade by the petitioner as afore said" and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JYOTHI ESWAR GOGINENI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR COOPERATION (AP)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
Heard Ms. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause raised in the writ petition would not survive.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 12.08.2026 ANI
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA
WRIT PETITION NO:185 of 2015
Dated: 12.08.2026
ANI