Andhra Pradesh High Court
MACMA/1410/2008 of ALLA VANASRI & ANOTHER Vs HARI KAUSHIK & ANOTHER on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1410/2008 Between: 1. ALLA VANASRI & ANOTHER, W/O. LATE ALLA
APHC010537882008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
Between:
1. ALLA VANASRI
& ANOTHER, W/O. LATE ALLA
VENKATA
SATYANARAYANA R/O. B-3, R.K'S SRI GAYATRI APARMENTS, CHINAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. ALLA MONISHA @ PARUL DHARMISTAA, D/O. LATE ALLA
VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MINOR REP. BY HER MOTHER AND
NATURAL GUARDIAN 1ST PETITIONER R/O. B-3, R.K'S SRI
GAYATRI APARMENTS, CHINAWALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...APPELLANT(S)
AND
1. HARI KAUSHIK ANOTHER, S/O. VIDYA SANKAR R/O. D.NO. 16-6- 10, OFFICIAL COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2. D SYAM SUNDER BABU, S/O. SAMSON C/O. T.V. SUDHA MOHAN, D.NO. 16-6-10, OFFICALS COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courta) to allow the MACMA b) to award Rs. 12,61,000/- towards compensation, c) to award costs IA NO: 1 OF 2005(MACMAMP 4268 OF 2005
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 9 days in preferring the MVCMA., as it would otherwise cause grave hardship and injustice to me, I pray for orders accordingly.
IA NO: 1 OF 2008(MACMAMP 3395 OF 2008
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to fix an early date for hearing of the above MACMA
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. B NAGESHWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T S VENKATARAMANA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
JUDGMENT:-
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal” today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The proceeding sheet dated 10.08.2026, would also show that there is no representation on behalf of the appellants.
2. In that view of the matter, the Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 12.08.2026. UPS
Dt.12.08.2026
UPS