Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1179/2025 of SMT V JAMUNA Vs SRI SRIMANNARAYANAPPA @ A NARAYANAPPA on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1179/2025 Between: 1. SMT V JAMUNA, W/O. NARAYANA, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE WIFE, R/O. KRISHNAGOWNI
APHC010145472025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1179/2025
Between:
1. SMT V JAMUNA, W/O. NARAYANA, AGE 32 YEARS, OCC-HOUSE
WIFE, R/O. KRISHNAGOWNI KOTTALU VILLAGE, PB VADA
PANCHAYATH AREA, GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SRI SRIMANNARAYANAPPA A NARAYANAPPA, S/O. BUSAPPA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC- VILLAGE SARPANCH R/O.
CHEEKATIPALLI
VILLAGE
AND
PANCHAYATH,
GUDIPALLI
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
2. G GANGAPPA, S/O. LATE GANTLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC-
R/O.
KOTAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SONARSANAPALLI
POST,
CHEEKATIPALLI
PANCHAYTH,
GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
3. B SRINIVASULU, S/O. LATE BAJJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI
POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
4. S VENKATAPATHI, S/O. B SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, OCC-
CULTIVATION,
R/O.
KOTAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SONARSANAPALLI
POST
CHEEKATIPALLI
PANCHAYTH,
GUDIPALLI MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT
5. S SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O. B SRINIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 26
YEARS,
OCC-CULTIVATION,
R/O.
KOTAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SONARSANAPALLI
POST,
CHEEKATIPALLI
PANCHAYTH,
6. G MUNEPPA, S/O. LATE GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION, R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI
POST,
CHEEKATIPALLI
PANCHAYTH,
GUDIPALLI
MANDAL
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
7. K VENKATESU, S/O. LATE KENCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC-CULTIVATION R/O. KOTAPALLI VILLAGE, SONARSANAPALLI
POST, CHEEKATIPALLI PANCHAYTH, GUDIPALLI MANDAL,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
8. G VENKATA SWAMY, S/O. LATE GUNDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65
YEARS,
OCC-
R/O.
KOTAPALLI
VILLAGE,
SONARSANAPALLI
POST,
CHEEKATIPALLI
PANCHAYTH,
GUDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of contempt of the courts Act for willfully and wontedly violating the orders of this Honble High Court in W.P. No. 30721 Of 2024 dated 30.12.2024 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to implead the proposed respondent No. 2 to 8 as parties/Respondents in C.C. No. of 2025 for disobeying the order dated 30- 12-2024 passed in WP.No.30721 of 2024 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S NAGARAJU
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. K.M.PAVAN KUMAR
The Court made the following:
CONTEMPT CASE No.1179 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. This Court, vide order dated 30.12.2024 in W.P.No.30721 of 2024, directed the respondents to restore the electricity connection to the petitioner.
3. Respondent Nos.2 to 8 filed reply in the contempt case and in paragraph No.13 it is stated that electricity connection is restored to the petitioner and the petitioner is cultivating the land and the respondents are not interfering with the electricity connection in any manner.
4. As the respondents have complied with the orders of this Court, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, interlocutory applications, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 12.08.2026 KBN
Contempt Case No.1179 of 2025
12.08.2026 KBN