Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/15586/2023 of AMAVARAPU VALLI Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI WRIT PETITION NO: 15586 OF 2023 Between: 1. AMAVARAPU VALLI, W/o. P. Murali Kumar, Aged 13 Years, Occ. Employee, R/o. Opp. to Village

APHC010302912023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

Between:

1. AMAVARAPU VALLI, W/o. P. Murali Kumar, Aged 13 Years, Occ.

Employee, R/o. Opp. to Village Secretariat, 1st Lane, Chevurivari Thota, Vaikuntapuram, Kavali, SPSR Nellore District.

...Petitioner

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by it's Principal Secretary, Higher Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

2. Vikrama Simhapuri University, Kakuturu Post, Venkatachalam Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, Rep. by its Registrar.

...Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order dated 31.05.2023 in terminating the petitioner from services is arbitrary, illegal and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No.2 to reinstate the petitioner into services forthwith and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspcnd the order No.VSU/NT/Estt/E3/A.Valli/Termi./2023, dated 31.05.2023 by allowing the petitioner to continue in the services and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: B SOMASEKHAR

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES III Counsel for the Respondents:CH.U.M.REDDY,SC For V.SIMHAPURI UNIVERSITY,NLR

The Court made the following order:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard Sri B. Somasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode and Sri Ch.U.Maheswar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2 University.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a Memo dated 10.08.2026 seeking to withdraw the writ petition by enclosing letter addressed by the petitioner to him.

3. Recording the said Memo dated 10.08.2026 filed by learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J

GVK

Dt. 12.08.2026

GVK

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead