Andhra Pradesh High Court
AS/77/2009 of Yadamani M.Nagarajan Vs Yenduluri Bhagyalatha on 11 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 77 OF 2009 Between: 1. Yadamani M.Nagarajan, S/o. Late Yadamani Muddu Krishnaiah R/o. 27/1/1132, Balaji Nagar, Near
APHC010143482009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA
PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 77 OF 2009
Between:
1.
Yadamani
M.Nagarajan,
S/o.
Late
Yadamani
Muddu
Krishnaiah R/o. 27/1/1132, Balaji Nagar, Near Swamy Dass Convent, Nellore Town, Nellore District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. Yenduluri Bhagyalatha, W/o. Nellore Siva Prasada Rao Employee (Cashier in Head Post Office) R/o. 27-II/1533, Balaji Nagar, Nellore Town, Nellore District.
...Respondent
IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 238 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the document (APSRTC Employees Thrift and Credit Co-operative Society Ltd.,
Page 1 of 2
Letter dated 28-6-1999 herein as additional evidence in the above appeal and mark as Ex.A9 on behalf of appellant.
IA NO: 2 OF 2009(ASMP 239 OF 2009
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from alienating or changing the physical features of the plaint schedule property in O.S.No.
163/2003 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Nellore, pending disposal of the above appeal.
Counsel for the Petitioner: 00
Counsel for the Respondent P SRIDHAR REDDY
The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI
GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 77/2009
JUDGMENT:-
As per the Registry endorsement, notice was sent to the appellant to the address mentioned in the grounds of appeal, and the same was returned with an endorsement stating “for want of present door number”. Therefore, service is held sufficient. It appears that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the matter.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, and the interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed.
_______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 12.08.2026 LSP
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…