Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30685/2013 of S. Rambabu, Vs The Municipal Corporation of Vijayawada. on 11 August 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30685/2013 Between: 1. S. RAMBABU,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO.
APHC010232072013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3457]
WEDNESDAY, THE 12th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 30685/2013
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. S. RAMBABU,, S/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DOOR NO. 61-25/3-1, RAMALINGESWARA NAGAR, KOLLIPARRA STREET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF VIJAYAWADA, Rep. by its Commissioner Municipal Corporation Office Vijayawada, Krishna District
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the officials of the respondent corporation in trying to demolish the second floor of the petitioner building bearing Door No. 61-25/3-1, Ramalingeswara Nagar, Kolliparra Street, Vijayawada, Krishna District and without issuing any notice and without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the officers of the respondent corporation not to demolish the petitioners building and to sanction the second floor plan and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 38095 OF 2013
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the officers of the respondent corporation not to demolish the petitioners building bearing Door No. 61-25/3.1, Ramalingeswara Nagar, Kolliparra Street, Vijayawada, Krishna District and to sanction the second floor plan, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(WVMP 2262 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 25.10.2013 passed in W.P.No.30685 of 2013 and dismiss the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2015(WPMP 118087 OF 2015
in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P S P SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent:
1. T BALASWAMI
2. S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC
The Court made the following order:
The grievance of the petitioner, insofar as the action of the respondent- Corporation in trying to demolish the second floor of the subject property, was protected by an interim order of this Court dated 25.10.2013. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that in pursuance of the application of the petitioner, the subject construction has been regularized vide proceedings dated 07.10.2016 under the BPS scheme. The relevant proceedings are placed on record.
Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ______________ HARINATH.N,J
12.08.2026 RJS
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION No:30685 of 2013
Dt: 12.08.2026
RJS