Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/21608/2026 of JP RAM INFRA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 10 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 21608/2026 Between: 1. JP RAM INFRA, DOOR NO. 3-48-46/C, TEMPLE TOWERS, 5TH LINE, BRUNDAVANGARDENS,

APHC010401132026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO: 21608/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. JP RAM INFRA, DOOR NO. 3-48-46/C, TEMPLE TOWERS, 5TH LINE, BRUNDAVANGARDENS, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER VASIREDDY JAYARAM.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPEMNT DEPATMENT,

SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

FINANCE AND

PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, NEAR D.G.P OFFICE, MANGALAGIRI,GUNTUR DISTRICT.

4. TENALI MUNICIPALITY, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

5. MUNICIPAL ENGINEER GRADE1, TENALI MUNICIPALITY, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 5 in not paying the final bill to the petitioner in respect of the Agreement No.444/2022- 23 dated 07-03-2023 in relation to the work for Leveling of House site at Jagan Anna Housing Lay Outs in Pedaravuru-1 (Block No.1) in Tenali Municipality, even after approval of the final Bill payable to the petitioner by the respondents 1 to 5 is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Articles 14 and 19

(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 5 to pay the final Bill dated 24-05-2023 for Rs. 27,99,000/- along with interest @ 12percent to the petitione IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the respondents 1 to 4 to release the payment of undisputed amount of Rs. 27,99,000/- by the respondent No.5 in order to pay the amount to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to implead the Andhra Pradesh State Housing Corporation Limited rep.by its Managing Director, Vijayawada as 6th respondent in the above writ petition No. 21608 of 2026 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. PRABHU NATH VASIREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. SIREESHA RANI VALLABHANENI SC For MUNICIPALITIES

2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

The Court made the following order:

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entrusted with the work i.e., leveling of House site at Jagan Anna Housing Lay Outs in Pedaravuru-1 (Block No.1) in Tenali Municipality vide Agreement No.444/2022-23, dated 07.03.2023.

2. It is submitted that the petitioner had completed the work entrusted to him and that the competent authority of the respondents had also approved the payments due and payable to the petitioner.

3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Smt. V. Sirisha Rani, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Corporation and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning.

4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent Corporation submits that the work has been completed and that the petitioner has also submitted the final bills and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner have been duly admitted. It is submitted that further funds are awaited and that, soon after the release of the funds, the bills due and payable to the petitioner shall be cleared.

5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, directing the respondents to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 11.08.2026 RJS

HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

WRIT PETITION NO:21608 of 2026

Dt: 11.08.2026

RJS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead