Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/8998/2023 of EDIGA KOPPULA NAGA PULLAIAH Vs THE STATE OF AP on 10 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 8998/2023 Between: Ediga Koppula Naga Pullaiah ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others
APHC010175922023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 11th DAY OF AUGUST 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 8998/2023
Between:
Ediga Koppula Naga Pullaiah
...PETITIONER
AND
The State Of Ap and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MALLELA BHASKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
Aggrieved by action of the respondent authorities in not conducting survey and fixing boundaries to the subject lands to an extent of Ac.0.54 cents in Sy.No.344, to an extent of Ac.0.93 cents in Sy.No.362 & to an extent of Ac.5.82 cents in Sy.No.100 situated at Gajulapalle revenue village, Mahanadi mandal, Nandyal district, upon the F-Line applications made by the petitioner dated 06.09.2022 & 30.01.2023, the present writ petition is filed.
2. There was no representation for the petitioners on 31.07.2026 and today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.
3. Sri Venkata Satyanarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue upon instructions of Tahsildar, Mahanandi mandal submitted that, the survey was already conducted by authorities by following due procedure as contemplated under Survey & Boundaries Act, 1923 and also issued an endorsement, as such there remains nothing for adjudication and prayed to pass appropriate orders in that regard.
4. A perusal of the instructions of Tahsildar, Mahanandi mandal along with other material would clearly indicate that upon F-Line applications made by the petitioner, the authorities have already conducted survey and also issued an endorsement. In view of the same, this writ petition is liable to be closed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No costs.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS